Genocide, the ‘family of mind’ and the romantic signature of Raphael Lemkin

Irvin-Erickson, Douglas

doi:10.1080/14623528.2013.821222

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…He was, nevertheless, systematic. 5 Thanks to the dedicated work of Steven Leonard Jacobs and Donna-Lee Frieze, Lemkin's works are being brought out of the archive and into print for the first time, allowing the depth and subtlety of Lemkin's ideas to finally be known.…”

Section: Reviewed By Douglas Irvin-ericksonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Book Review:Totally Unofficial: The Autobiography of Raphael Lemkin, edited by Donna-Lee Frieze, Yale University Press, 2013

Irvin-Erickson¹

2013

GSP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Reviewed By Douglas Irvin-ericksonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Book Review:Totally Unofficial: The Autobiography of Raphael Lemkin, edited by Donna-Lee Frieze, Yale University Press, 2013

Irvin-Erickson¹

2013

GSP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This violent repression and removal of national minorities in the Tsarist, and later the Soviet state, was the historical and political context that gave rise to the concept of genocide. 9 Raphael Lemkin, who was born in Imperial Russia and an expert on Soviet criminal law, coined the word genocide between 1942 and 1943, but he developed much of the theoretical concept of genocide during his work with the League of Nations in the 1930s when he attempted to outlaw state terror that was intended to destroy national minorities physically and culturally and remove them from a given society. 10 As Terry Martin has found, "between 1935 and 1938, at least nine Soviet nationalitiesPoles, Germans, Finns, Estonians, Latvians, Koreans, Chinese, Kurds, Iranians-were all subjected to ethnic cleansing."…”

Section: Dispossession Genocide and Russian Statecraftmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Double Dispossession: The Crimean Tatars After Russia's Ukrainian War

Blank

2015

GSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.Genocide and genocidal political processes have been used by the Russian state for decades-if not centuries-as a technique of self-colonial rule intended to eliminate "dissident" ethnic identities. Within this context, the historical fate of the Crimean Tatars is surely a unique one. Despite Soviet obstructions, the Crimean Tatars eventually returned to their homeland in Crimea after suffering forced deportations and genocide at the hands of the Soviet government. Now, 70 years after their deportation and genocide by Stalin, the Crimean Tatars are still fighting for justice. Defined as an autonomous group in their own land under the Ukrainian government, the Tatars found themselves in an even more precarious position when they were forcibly transplanted back into Putin's Russia after the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea. In a Russian state that continues to resort to the deportation and the repression of "dissident" or otherwise politically suspect ethnic minorities, Crimean Tatars risk not only new repressions and injustices but a continuation of genocidal political and social repression. Keywords

show abstract

“…Podemos pensar, rapidamente, na inadequação do argumento de que a mera utilização de um conceito fora do seu tempo seria anacrônico. O termo 'genocídio' surge em 1944 com os estudos de Raphael Lemki (IRVIN-ERICKSON, 2013). Sua proposta era descrever as práticas politicamente orientadas para os extermínios de determinados grupos ou raças.…”

unclassified

E havia uma ditadura cis-hétero-militar?

Afonso-Rocha

2021

PERI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este texto não deveria ser um artigo. Também não chega a ser um texto experimental. Longe disso, é, digamos, o relato de uma investigação. Gestei-o após a resposta que recebi do professor Renan Quinalha numa dessas lives de quarentena, agora tão comuns em nosso dia a dia. Acredito que foi aquela realizada pelo projeto História em Quarentena. Como decidi publicá-lo, acrescentei algumas citações, revisitei a argumentação utilizada em minha dissertação. Evitei, imaginariamente, deixá-lo academicista. Penso num diálogo aberto que tento construir. O risco que corro – que sempre corremos – é o do dizer solitário. Monólogo espectral muito bem conhecido por nós, pesquisadores não-sudestinos ou não-sulistas. Vamos ao que importa. Sobre o que é este texto? Quinalha foi o primeiro pesquisador, que eu tenha conhecimento, a utilizar a expressão “ditadura hétero-militar” para se referir à heterogeneidade das políticas sexuais (e de gênero) adotadas, ou pelo menos, intensificadas durante o período da ditadura brasileira. Desde que defendeu sua tese, em 2017, Quinalha parece ter se tornado referência nacional obrigatória nos estudos de confluência entre “homossexualidades” e ditadura. Disso decorreu a popularização, tanto no meio acadêmico quanto na militância, do uso da noção. Ainda que alguns apresentem certa resistência, o conceito aparentemente “pegou”, como diria Althusser. É sobre as (im)pertinências teórico-epistemológicas dessa noção conceitual que quero argumentar.

show abstract

Genocide, the ‘family of mind’ and the romantic signature of Raphael Lemkin

Cited by 10 publications

References 10 publications

Book Review:Totally Unofficial: The Autobiography of Raphael Lemkin, edited by Donna-Lee Frieze, Yale University Press, 2013

Book Review:Totally Unofficial: The Autobiography of Raphael Lemkin, edited by Donna-Lee Frieze, Yale University Press, 2013

A Double Dispossession: The Crimean Tatars After Russia's Ukrainian War

E havia uma ditadura cis-hétero-militar?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About