“…This means that a population can only achieve its adaptability by distribution of the variation across individuals (e.g., Den Boer, et al, 1993 [62] ). Besides that, heterozygosity can be higher in stressful environments (review Parsons, 1996 a [205] , 1996 b [206] ; Rankevich et al, 1996 [220] ; Nevo et al, 1997 [186] ; Prus-Glowacki et al, 1999 [216] ), the relation between heterozygosity and stress tolerance can be variable (e.g., Kopp et al, 1994 [133] ), and it is also possible that -in the case of functional importance of an isozyme genotype with regard to a stress factor or in the case of linkage with genes involved in stress tolerance -selection of resistant genotypes results in an increase in the frequency of specific adaptive alleles while the total heterozygosity for that isozyme locus decreases (Hattemer and Müller-Starck, 1989 [111] ; Prus-Glowacki and Godzik, 1991 [215] ; Kopp et al, 1992 [132] ) because alleles which are only present in susceptible genotypes are lost. On the basis of these results, Guttman (1994 [101] ) and Fox (1995 [76] ) concluded that the formation of a resistant but genetically uniform population can imply increased susceptibility for new disturbances in the environment.…”