1994
DOI: 10.1016/0305-1978(94)90041-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics indicators of environmental tolerance among fish populations exposed to acid deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies by Rankevich et al [53] indicate that under stress conditions the heterozygosity of a population may be higher. However, this was not confirmed in the present study, which is in line with Kopp et al [54], who claim that the relationship between stress tolerance and heterozygosity is different. According to Kopp et al [54], stress factors increase the frequency of specific adaptive alleles, while the total heterozygosity of the population decreases.…”
Section: Interactions Observedcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Studies by Rankevich et al [53] indicate that under stress conditions the heterozygosity of a population may be higher. However, this was not confirmed in the present study, which is in line with Kopp et al [54], who claim that the relationship between stress tolerance and heterozygosity is different. According to Kopp et al [54], stress factors increase the frequency of specific adaptive alleles, while the total heterozygosity of the population decreases.…”
Section: Interactions Observedcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This means that a population can only achieve its adaptability by distribution of the variation across individuals (e.g., Den Boer, et al, 1993 [62] ). Besides that, heterozygosity can be higher in stressful environments (review Parsons, 1996 a [205] , 1996 b [206] ; Rankevich et al, 1996 [220] ; Nevo et al, 1997 [186] ; Prus-Glowacki et al, 1999 [216] ), the relation between heterozygosity and stress tolerance can be variable (e.g., Kopp et al, 1994 [133] ), and it is also possible that -in the case of functional importance of an isozyme genotype with regard to a stress factor or in the case of linkage with genes involved in stress tolerance -selection of resistant genotypes results in an increase in the frequency of specific adaptive alleles while the total heterozygosity for that isozyme locus decreases (Hattemer and Müller-Starck, 1989 [111] ; Prus-Glowacki and Godzik, 1991 [215] ; Kopp et al, 1992 [132] ) because alleles which are only present in susceptible genotypes are lost. On the basis of these results, Guttman (1994 [101] ) and Fox (1995 [76] ) concluded that the formation of a resistant but genetically uniform population can imply increased susceptibility for new disturbances in the environment.…”
Section: Relationship Between Genetic Diversity and Adaptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropogenic factors (such as pollution) thus seem to favor the selection of individuals with a particular genetic makeup within fish populations through differential survival (Thorpe et al, 1981(Thorpe et al, , smith et al, 1983Nevo et al, 1984, Gillespie & Guttman, 1989and Duan et al, 2001). In addition, according to Kopp et al (1994), genotypes that survive exposure to pollution or salinity may be the most tolerant individuals to environmental stress. in addition, Chagnon & Guttman (1989) and Gillespie & Guttman (1989) mention that the degree of genetic variation maintained by a population may be evidence of its ability to survive in future environmental alterations by moderating or modulating the stressful effects of pollutants and providing the population with the necessary genetic plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%