2021
DOI: 10.3390/life11101110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics and Cognitive Vulnerability to Sleep Deprivation in Healthy Subjects: Interaction of ADORA2A, TNF-α and COMT Polymorphisms

Abstract: Several genetic polymorphisms differentiate between healthy individuals who are more cognitively vulnerable or resistant during total sleep deprivation (TSD). Common metrics of cognitive functioning for classifying vulnerable and resilient individuals include the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), Go/noGo executive inhibition task, and subjective daytime sleepiness. We evaluated the influence of 14 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on cognitive responses during total sleep deprivation (continuous wakefulne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that homozygous carriers of the COMT A allele, resulting in high dopamine levels due to low COMT enzymatic activity, had increased levels of IGF-I in response to prolonged wakefulness beyond 25 h in the PBO condition, whereas IGF-I levels were not increased in carriers of the G allele (either G/A or G/G) resulting in low dopamine levels due to high COMT enzymatic activity. This appears to be consistent with poorer cognitive performance (in the executive go-no-go inhibition task) during prolonged wakefulness in subjects carrying the G/G genotype compared to carriers of the A allele (homozygous and heterozygous), as we have previously shown [8]. We can thus suggest that IGF-I may be involved in sustaining proper cognition during prolonged wakefulness, but that this response would be COMT genotype dependent favoring the A allele carriers, as this polymorphism strongly modulates dopaminergic activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results showed that homozygous carriers of the COMT A allele, resulting in high dopamine levels due to low COMT enzymatic activity, had increased levels of IGF-I in response to prolonged wakefulness beyond 25 h in the PBO condition, whereas IGF-I levels were not increased in carriers of the G allele (either G/A or G/G) resulting in low dopamine levels due to high COMT enzymatic activity. This appears to be consistent with poorer cognitive performance (in the executive go-no-go inhibition task) during prolonged wakefulness in subjects carrying the G/G genotype compared to carriers of the A allele (homozygous and heterozygous), as we have previously shown [8]. We can thus suggest that IGF-I may be involved in sustaining proper cognition during prolonged wakefulness, but that this response would be COMT genotype dependent favoring the A allele carriers, as this polymorphism strongly modulates dopaminergic activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, basic memory scores were lower in Val/Val (or G/G) carriers [21]. Our previous results also indicated a greater cognitive vulnerability to sleep deprivation, as well as sensitivity to CAF intake, in healthy subjects carrying the COMT G/G genotype compared to G/A and A/A genotypes [3, 8]. Taken together, these results suggest that there may be COMT genotype-dependent interindividual variability in IGF-1 levels in response to an experimental condition such as sleep deprivation under CAF administration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, several endogenous factors are thought to contribute to the cognitive consequences of severe sleep deficits including the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 (GH/IGF-1) trophic system, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), hormones, and cytokines ( Kreutzmann et al, 2015 ; Chennaoui et al, 2020 ). There are also genotype-dependent interindividual differences in phenotypic neurobehavioral responses to sleep deprivation or restriction ( Bodenmann et al, 2012 ; Erblang et al, 2021b ; Casale and Goel, 2021 ).…”
Section: Physiological and Cognitive Responses To Sleep Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%