2023
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1157451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetically supported causality between gut microbiota, gut metabolites and low back pain: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Abstract: BackgroundPrevious studies have implicated a vital association between gut microbiota/gut microbial metabolites and low back pain (LBP), but their causal relationship is still unclear. Therefore, we aim to comprehensively investigate their causal relationship and identify the effect of gut microbiota/gut microbial metabolites on risk of LBP using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study.MethodsSummary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of gut microbiota (18,340 participants), gut microbial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, due to the insufficient number of SNPs available for subsequent MR analysis in the MiBioGen consortium, we opted to include only GM-related SNPs at a slightly higher threshold (1 × 10 –5 ) instead of the conventional threshold (5 × 10 –8 ). This decision was based on a prior publication ( Su et al, 2023 ). However, we did exclude SNPs with F-statistics below 10 to minimize the potential for weak instrument bias and improve the overall robustness of the statistical results ( Burgess and Thompson, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, due to the insufficient number of SNPs available for subsequent MR analysis in the MiBioGen consortium, we opted to include only GM-related SNPs at a slightly higher threshold (1 × 10 –5 ) instead of the conventional threshold (5 × 10 –8 ). This decision was based on a prior publication ( Su et al, 2023 ). However, we did exclude SNPs with F-statistics below 10 to minimize the potential for weak instrument bias and improve the overall robustness of the statistical results ( Burgess and Thompson, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the strict threshold ( p < 5.0 × 10 −8 ), only a few instrumental variables were obtained. To increase the number of instrumental variables, a threshold of p < 1.0 ×10 −5 was adopted ( 24 , 25 ). Palindromic SNPs and SNPs not present in the outcomes (AS, PsA, and EA) were excluded from the instrumental variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the potential for reverse causality, we conducted a reverse MR analysis. Since there were limited SNPs for the Reverse MR when selecting IVs with a P ‐value < 5e−08, we relaxed the selection criteria for SNPs to a P ‐value < 1e−5 32‐34 . As mentioned above, to ensure that the included SNPs still meet the requirements for IVs, we also calculated the F‐statistics for all SNPs in the reverse MR analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%