Genetically Modified Organisms in the Portuguese Press: thematization and anchoring

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to examine how the recent themata developments in Social Representations Theory can be linked with the classical process involved in the construction of social representations-anchoring-, as well as with the communicative modalities that are part of the theory since its inception. This was done through a study of the representation of GMOs in the Portuguese press, taken as an opportunity for addressing the issues related to the role played by old categories in rendering new meanings and in establishing new categories. A further objective of the study, more applied in nature, was to explore whether the central characteristics of the representations of biotechnology in European countries were also present in Portugal. All articles that included the expressions Genetically Modified/Genetic Modification/Manipulation or Transgenics, were collected, in five Portuguese newspapers, during the years of 1999, 2000 and 2001. Content analysis of the 239 articles collected showed that their thematical organisation re-constitutes the Red/Green dichotomy found in most European countries. The Red/health discussion is structured around such themata as health/disease, risk/safety, benefits/problems, and anchors in categories like science and progress. The nature /culture opposition emerges, in turn, in the Green/food discussion, which anchors on categories like ideology and employs Propaganda as a communicative modality-a set of indicators configuring a more polemic debate. The conclusions discuss the relevance of linking themata with anchoring and the importance of devising more fine-grained tools for the analysis of Diffusion.

Damned If You Do, Dammed If You Don't: Debates on Dam Removal in the Swedish Media

“…Similar to dichotomies such as health/disease, global/ local, and nature/culture, which Castro and Gomes (2005) identified in the media framing of genetically modified foods, this pair becomes a central anchoring point of the frames on both sides of the dam removal controversy.…”

“…In that case, the same issue, i.e., whether or not to establish a national park, was interpreted by the two main stakeholder groups in radically different ways based on different ideas of what constitutes "good" nature. Oppositional pairs such as nature/culture, public/private, and knowledge/ignorance can be particularly strong framing devices (Castro and Gomes 2005). Frames tend to anchor bundled packages of symbols, metaphors, and modes of reasoning that give meaning to an issue (Gamson and Modigliani 1989).…”

Viva la Nano-Revolución! A Semantic Analysis of the Spanish National Press

“…These semantic maps are often interpreted as core elements of social representations: examples of the use of such maps include Castro and Gomes (2005) on the representation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in the Portuguese press; Wagner et al (2002) on biotechnology in the European press; and more recently Gauthier (2009) on social representations of risk in food irradiation in Canada. Thus, rather than classify articles using a favourability index (e.g.…”

Using social representations theory to make sense of climate change: what scientists and nonscientists in Australia think

“…Research within this framework has investigated complex and challenging social phenomena such as HIV/AIDS, mental illness, and human rights. It has also been used extensively in relation to environmental concern (Castro 2006), including public understandings of biotechnology, hydrogen energy, and environmental risk (Bauer and Gaskell 2002, Castro and Gomes 2005, Kronberger and Wagner 2007, Sherry-Brennan et al 2010, Callaghan et al 2012.…”