Genetically modified animals: Options and issues for traceability and enforcement

Lievens, Antoon; Petrillo, Mauro; Querci, Maddalena; Patak, Alex

doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.05.001

Cited by 27 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus far, efforts in editing the genome of livestock have mostly concentrated on largely uncontroversial human health applications, such as generating animal models of human genetic diseases, producing biopharmaceuticals and xenotransplantation. However, genomic and other advances are uncovering a growing list of putative target genes and mutations for which editing has been or is being pursued in order to improve aspects of livestock production 175,178,179 , such as growth rate, muscle mass, meat fat content, milk composition, wool growth, resistance to bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases, temperature tolerance, animal welfare and environmental impact (TAble 3). A specific application that is worth mentioning is the generation of malespecific double-muscling by inserting a trans-acting inhibitor of MSTN on the Y chromosome, which could have a major economic impact by improving the carcass yield and thereby the value of male dairy calves 180 .…”

Section: Genomic Advances Are Uncovering a Growing List Of Target Genmentioning

confidence: 99%

Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The world demand for animal-based food products is anticipated to increase by 70% by 2050. Meeting this demand in a way that has a minimal impact on the environment will require the implementation of advanced technologies, and methods to improve the genetic quality of livestock are expected to play a large part. Over the past 10 years, genomic selection has been introduced in several major livestock species and has more than doubled genetic progress in some. However, additional improvements are required. Genomic information of increasing complexity (including genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and microbiome data), combined with technological advances for its cost-effective collection and use, will make a major contribution.

show abstract

Section: Genomic Advances Are Uncovering a Growing List Of Target Genmentioning

confidence: 99%

Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…New food technologies provide diverse opportunities for that purpose. By using gene technology, for example, the nutrient quality of meat can be improved or animals can be engineered to be more resistant to diseases (Lievens, Petrillo, Querci, & Patak, ). Other technologies, for example, nanotechnology, have advantages such as prolonging food shelf life, which could reduce food waste and thus conserve resources (Chaudhry et al., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New food technologies have a high potential to transform the current resource‐consuming food system to a more efficient and sustainable one, but public acceptance of new food technologies is rather low. Such an avoidance might be maintained by a deeply preserved risk avoidance system called disgust. In an online survey, participants (N = 313) received information about a variety of new food technology applications (i.e., genetically modified meat/fish, edible nanotechnology coating film, nanotechnology food box, artificial meat/milk, and a synthetic food additive). Every new food technology application was rated according to the respondent's willingness to eat (WTE) it (i.e., acceptance), risk, benefit, and disgust perceptions. Furthermore, food disgust sensitivity was measured using the Food Disgust Scale. Overall, the WTE both gene‐technology applications and meat coated with an edible nanotechnology film were low and disgust responses toward all three applications were high. In full mediation models, food disgust sensitivity predicted the disgust response toward each new food technology application, which in turn influenced WTE them. Effects of disgust responses on the WTE a synthetic food additive were highest for and lowest for the edible nanotechnology coating film compared to the other technologies. Results indicate that direct disgust responses influence acceptance and risk and benefit perceptions of new food technologies. Beyond the discussion of this study, implications for future research and strategies to increase acceptance of new food technologies are discussed.

show abstract

“…Wall et al (2005) reported transgenic Jersey cows secreting lysostaphin were protected against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Listings of the various other works undertaken in the genetic engineering of livestock species can be found in reviews by Laible et al (2015) and Lievens et al (2015).…”

Section: Genetic Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Invited review: Reproductive and genomic technologies to optimize breeding strategies for genetic progress in dairy cattle

Fleming¹,

Abdalla²,

Maltecca

et al. 2018

Arch. Anim. Breed.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Dairy cattle breeders have exploited technological advances that have emerged in the past in regards to reproduction and genomics. The implementation of such technologies in routine breeding programs has permitted genetic gains in traditional milk production traits as well as, more recently, in low-heritability traits like health and fertility. As demand for dairy products increases, it is important for dairy breeders to optimize the use of available technologies and to consider the many emerging technologies that are currently being investigated in various fields. Here we review a number of technologies that have helped shape dairy breeding programs in the past and present, along with those potentially forthcoming. These tools have materialized in the areas of reproduction, genotyping and sequencing, genetic modification, and epigenetics. Although many of these technologies bring encouraging opportunities for genetic improvement of dairy cattle populations, their applications and benefits need to be weighed with their impacts on economics, genetic diversity, and society.

show abstract

Genetically modified animals: Options and issues for traceability and enforcement

Cited by 27 publications

References 60 publications

Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement

Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement

When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies

Invited review: Reproductive and genomic technologies to optimize breeding strategies for genetic progress in dairy cattle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About