2004
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetically encoded sensors for ions and metabolites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of sensory derivatives of fluorescent proteins have been designed. [121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139] These genetically encoded biosensors can complement spectroscopic data of the target molecule by probing essential cytoplasmic properties in space and time, e.g. the concentration of ions and small molecules as well as pH and reduction potential (Fig.…”
Section: Challenges and Chancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of sensory derivatives of fluorescent proteins have been designed. [121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139] These genetically encoded biosensors can complement spectroscopic data of the target molecule by probing essential cytoplasmic properties in space and time, e.g. the concentration of ions and small molecules as well as pH and reduction potential (Fig.…”
Section: Challenges and Chancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N and C termini move closer together upon ligand binding by 0.7 nm in case of MBP, while in the case of RBP the termini move further apart by 0.2 nm (cf. Okumoto et al 2004). The similar FRET ratio change values may thus be due to the use of flexible linkers leading to rotational averaging of the fluorophore dipole orientation ensemble.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%