2004
DOI: 10.1080/09064700510009225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation of in vivo muscle glycerol, glycogen, and pigment in Danish purebred pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The moderate heritability estimate for iron content in pork found in this study confirms previous heritability estimates for iron characteristics in pork of 0.39 6 0.09 for haem pigment (Larzul et al, 1997) and 0.27 6 0.09 for soluble myoglobin content (Newcom et al, 2004). Heritability estimates were somewhat lower for pigment in pork (Oksbjerg et al, 2004) and for total iron content in sheep meat (Mortimer et al, 2010) with estimates of 0.17 6 0.02 and 0.12 6 0.05, respectively.…”
Section: Ironsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The moderate heritability estimate for iron content in pork found in this study confirms previous heritability estimates for iron characteristics in pork of 0.39 6 0.09 for haem pigment (Larzul et al, 1997) and 0.27 6 0.09 for soluble myoglobin content (Newcom et al, 2004). Heritability estimates were somewhat lower for pigment in pork (Oksbjerg et al, 2004) and for total iron content in sheep meat (Mortimer et al, 2010) with estimates of 0.17 6 0.02 and 0.12 6 0.05, respectively.…”
Section: Ironsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Genetic correlations between iron content in pork and L* values ranged from 20.54 6 0.23 to 20.61 6 0.14, indicating that pork with a higher iron content is darker. The magnitudes of genetic correlations were slightly lower in Oksbjerg et al (2004), who found estimates of genetic correlations of pigment in pork with a* value of 0.59 6 0.04 and with L* value of 20.46 6 0.06. At the phenotypic level, Lindahl et al (2001) found that 86% and 90% of the variation in L* and a* value of pork was explained by pigment content and myoglobin forms, highlighting the strong association between these colour characteristics and measures of iron content in pork.…”
Section: Genetic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the selected pigs of the present study had the same glycogen concentration as the normal farm level (80-90 Amol/g), prolonged pre-slaughter stress of transport and fasting reduced glycogen level to one third of its resting value and thus resulting in the high incidence of DFD meat in the present study. Recently, Oksbjerg et al (2004) reported that the glycogen concentration in the longissimus dorsi muscle was negatively correlated with the pH24 (À 0.41 F 0.04) and food conversion ratio (À 0.25 F 0.06) but was positively correlated with lean meat percentage (À 0.35 F 0.04) and uncorrelated with growth rate (À 0.04 F 0.06). As the pH24 values are not different between the high and low growth lines, it is suggested that selection for increased growth rate on restricted feeding may have not caused any changes in composition of muscle types or glycogen levels.…”
Section: Feeding Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several decades, breeding strategies oriented on the production of lean and fast growing pigs lead also to increase of the glycogen concentration in meat (Lonergan, et. al, 2001;Oksbjerg, et. al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%