2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variation of Drought Tolerance in Pinus pinaster at Three Hierarchical Levels: A Comparison of Induced Osmotic Stress and Field Testing

Abstract: Understanding the survival capacity of forest trees to periods of severe water stress could improve knowledge of the adaptive potential of different species under future climatic scenarios. In long lived organisms, like forest trees, the combination of induced osmotic stress treatments and field testing can elucidate the role of drought tolerance during the early stages of establishment, the most critical in the life of the species. We performed a Polyethylene glycol-osmotic induced stress experiment and evalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the large differences between Scots pine and maritime pine with respect to their climatic niches, we focused on genes for general responses to different types of abiotic stresses. This is also consistent with previous studies ranking the importance of different fitness-related traits for local adaptation in the species (for Scots pine, see Castro, Zamora, H odar, & G omez, 2002;Galiano, Mart ınez-Vilalta, & Lloret, 2010;Ryypp€ o, Iivonen, Rikala, Sutinen, & Vapaavuori, 1998; and for maritime pine see Corcuera, Gil-Pelegrin, & Notivol, 2011;Gaspar, Velasco, Feito, Al ıa, & Majada, 2013;Lamy et al, 2014;Ram ırez-Valiente & Robledo-Arnuncio, 2014). Then, we used complementary methods to get insights into the action of selective forces, both at specific genes and at genomewide and considered the specific demographic, ecological and historical settings of each species to discuss the possible factors (both methodological and biological) that may explain our results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Given the large differences between Scots pine and maritime pine with respect to their climatic niches, we focused on genes for general responses to different types of abiotic stresses. This is also consistent with previous studies ranking the importance of different fitness-related traits for local adaptation in the species (for Scots pine, see Castro, Zamora, H odar, & G omez, 2002;Galiano, Mart ınez-Vilalta, & Lloret, 2010;Ryypp€ o, Iivonen, Rikala, Sutinen, & Vapaavuori, 1998; and for maritime pine see Corcuera, Gil-Pelegrin, & Notivol, 2011;Gaspar, Velasco, Feito, Al ıa, & Majada, 2013;Lamy et al, 2014;Ram ırez-Valiente & Robledo-Arnuncio, 2014). Then, we used complementary methods to get insights into the action of selective forces, both at specific genes and at genomewide and considered the specific demographic, ecological and historical settings of each species to discuss the possible factors (both methodological and biological) that may explain our results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These data are in agreement with the observations of Gaspar et al . () who showed significant differences (α<0.0001) in the survival rates between the provenances from Atlantic and Mediterranean regions in PEG‐induced osmotic stress experiments. Additional genetic studies by chloroplast microsatellite markers (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Fernandes and Rigolot 2007), drought tolerance (Gaspar et al 2013) and cold tolerance (Prada et al 2014). Based on the relationships between the phenotypic expression of these traits and the environmental conditions in the place of origin, it has been inferred that the differentiation among provenances could be related to adaptive processes.…”
Section: Nematodes (#)mentioning
confidence: 99%