2004
DOI: 10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0204:gvocme]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variation of Cassava (Manihot Esculenta Crantz) Cultivated by Chibchan Amerindians of Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was also shown within cassava populations in Costa Rica (Zaldivar et al 2004) and Africa (Raji et al 2009), within regions or cluster groups of cassava (Mühlen et al 2000;Cabral et al 2002;Lokko et al 2006;Siqueira et al 2009), as well as within households with sweet potato (Veasey et al 2008). Peroni et al (2007) obtained values indicating that despite the higher diversity of the sweet varieties of cassava, in comparison with the bitter ones, the divergence among the two groups was low, however, significant, with most genetic diversity concentrated within groups.…”
Section: Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This result was also shown within cassava populations in Costa Rica (Zaldivar et al 2004) and Africa (Raji et al 2009), within regions or cluster groups of cassava (Mühlen et al 2000;Cabral et al 2002;Lokko et al 2006;Siqueira et al 2009), as well as within households with sweet potato (Veasey et al 2008). Peroni et al (2007) obtained values indicating that despite the higher diversity of the sweet varieties of cassava, in comparison with the bitter ones, the divergence among the two groups was low, however, significant, with most genetic diversity concentrated within groups.…”
Section: Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The secondary gene pool includes M. triphylla, M. pilosa, M. brachyloba, M. anomala, M. epruinosa, M. gracilis, M. tripartita, M. leptophylla, M. pohlii, M. glaziovii, M. dichotoma, M. aesculifolia, and M. chlorosticta. Cassava is an interesting case because even though relatively little is known about its genetics, a molecular map has already been developed (Fregene et al 1997(Fregene et al , 2000Mba et al 2001). In addition, many studies of genetic variability among and within landraces have been conducted (Asante and Offei 2003;Elias et al 2001aElias et al , 2001bElias et al , 2004Peroni and Hanazaki 2002;Sambatti et al 2001;Zaldivar et al 2004). In general, the vegetative reproduction of the crop has not necessarily led to a drastic reduction of genetic variability, particularly when it is used as a reliable food security staple crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional agriculture maintains high levels of species and genetic diversity of cultivated plants (Altieri et al 1987;Beckerman 1983;Bellon and Brush 1994;Bellon 1996;Lambert 1996;Brush 2000;Zaldivar et al 2002Zaldivar et al , 2004. Home gardens are a form of traditional agriculture widely distributed throughout the world (Hodel and Gessler 1999;Lamont et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is very little known about the genetic diversity of Mesoamerican cassava (Chavarriaga-Aguirre et al 1999), particularly in Central America. Zaldivar et al (2004) used isozyme markers to study genetic diversity of cassava cultivars being grown in home gardens of Chibchan Amerindians from Costa Rica. Their data revealed high levels of genetic variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%