2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation of 17 autosomal STR loci in the Zhuang ethnic minority from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in the south of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ha Hlai, a branch of Hainan Hlai, speaks Ha Hlai localism which is a branch of Tai‐Kadai language generally belongs to the Sino‐Tibetan language family. To illustrate the genetic differences of the Sino‐Tibetan language‐speaking populations, especially for the Ha Hlai, we established a database which included 49 populations with Sino‐Tibetan language (30 Chinese/Sinitic, 8 Tai‐Kadai, 6 Tibeto‐Burman, and 5 Hmong‐Mien language‐speaking population, totally 60,347 individuals) to perform PCA based on allelic frequencies of the same 19 autosomal STRs (Bai et al, 2017; Chan, Chiu, Tsui, Wong, & Fung, 2005; Chen Chunbao, Tian Xin, & Hanhua, 2017; Chen et al, 2017; Chen, Zhu, Shiming, You, & Ma, 2010; Deng et al, 2007; Fan, Wang, Chen, et al, 2019; Fan, Wang, Ren, et al, 2019; Ferdous et al, 2010; Guo, 2017; Guo, Li, Wei, Ye, & Chen, 2017; He et al, 2017; Hongdan et al, 2017; Huihui Lian, Lin, & Li, 2015; Jingzhou Wang, Zhai, Wang, Zhang, & Wang, 2015; Kraaijenbrink, van Driem, Tshering of Gaselô, & de Knijff, 2007; Le Wang, Zhang, Bai, & Ye, 2013; Li, Zheng, & Jun, 2017; Li et al, 2015, 2018; Liao et al, 2019; Lili Zhang et al, 2017; Liu, Liu, & Wang, 2006a, 2006b; Liu, Chen, Huang, et al, 2017; Liu, Chen, Mei, et al, 2017; Meng Pan et al, 2012; Qiuling Liu, Huiling, & Chen, 2003; Shen, Kang, Dong, Guo, & Wang, 2015; Sun et al, 2017; Sun, Zhang, Wu, Shen, & Wu, 2015; Wenming Han, 2016; Xiao, Zhang, Wei, Pan, & Huang, 2016; Xie et al, 2014; Xiuzi & Changchun, 2017; Xu, Feng, & Yao, 2017; Xu, Xu, Wang, & Yao, 2017; Yang et al, 2017, 2018; Yao et al, 2016; Zhang, 2015; Zhang, Zhao, Guo, Liu, & Wang, 2015; Zhang et al, 2013, 2018; Zhang, Du, et al, 2017; Zhang, Hu, Du, Nie, et al,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ha Hlai, a branch of Hainan Hlai, speaks Ha Hlai localism which is a branch of Tai‐Kadai language generally belongs to the Sino‐Tibetan language family. To illustrate the genetic differences of the Sino‐Tibetan language‐speaking populations, especially for the Ha Hlai, we established a database which included 49 populations with Sino‐Tibetan language (30 Chinese/Sinitic, 8 Tai‐Kadai, 6 Tibeto‐Burman, and 5 Hmong‐Mien language‐speaking population, totally 60,347 individuals) to perform PCA based on allelic frequencies of the same 19 autosomal STRs (Bai et al, 2017; Chan, Chiu, Tsui, Wong, & Fung, 2005; Chen Chunbao, Tian Xin, & Hanhua, 2017; Chen et al, 2017; Chen, Zhu, Shiming, You, & Ma, 2010; Deng et al, 2007; Fan, Wang, Chen, et al, 2019; Fan, Wang, Ren, et al, 2019; Ferdous et al, 2010; Guo, 2017; Guo, Li, Wei, Ye, & Chen, 2017; He et al, 2017; Hongdan et al, 2017; Huihui Lian, Lin, & Li, 2015; Jingzhou Wang, Zhai, Wang, Zhang, & Wang, 2015; Kraaijenbrink, van Driem, Tshering of Gaselô, & de Knijff, 2007; Le Wang, Zhang, Bai, & Ye, 2013; Li, Zheng, & Jun, 2017; Li et al, 2015, 2018; Liao et al, 2019; Lili Zhang et al, 2017; Liu, Liu, & Wang, 2006a, 2006b; Liu, Chen, Huang, et al, 2017; Liu, Chen, Mei, et al, 2017; Meng Pan et al, 2012; Qiuling Liu, Huiling, & Chen, 2003; Shen, Kang, Dong, Guo, & Wang, 2015; Sun et al, 2017; Sun, Zhang, Wu, Shen, & Wu, 2015; Wenming Han, 2016; Xiao, Zhang, Wei, Pan, & Huang, 2016; Xie et al, 2014; Xiuzi & Changchun, 2017; Xu, Feng, & Yao, 2017; Xu, Xu, Wang, & Yao, 2017; Yang et al, 2017, 2018; Yao et al, 2016; Zhang, 2015; Zhang, Zhao, Guo, Liu, & Wang, 2015; Zhang et al, 2013, 2018; Zhang, Du, et al, 2017; Zhang, Hu, Du, Nie, et al,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, we find that DYS438, DYS391, DYS437 and DYS645 loci exhibit relatively low genetic diversities in the studied population. Similar results are also observed in Hunan Zhuang and Guangxi Zhuang populations ( Feng et al, 2020 ; Guo et al, 2017a ). We infer that these four Y-STRs might be selected for forensic application in European populations because these loci exhibit relatively high GD values in European populations, especially for DYS391, DYS437 and DYS438 loci ( Hallenberg et al, 2005 ; Pickrahn et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These Dongs are mainly distributed in southeastern Guizhou Province and adjacent to Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Hunan Province ( ). So far, some genetic data on the Y-STRs of Hunan Dong ( Feng et al, 2020 ), the autosomal STRs of Guangxi Dong ( Guo et al, 2017a ) and the mitochondrial DNA of Guizhou Dong ( Ren et al, 2022 ) have been reported. However, there are no studies on the Y-STRs of the Dong population in Guizhou.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used CLUMPAK 28 and DISTRUCT 29 to generate the final results of STRU CTU RE. To evaluate genetic relatedness with other Asian populations, we used POPTREE v.2 30 to generate a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree based on F st computation by allele frequency of 15 STR loci of 29 populations from South and Southeast Asia 8,9,11,12,14,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%