1985
DOI: 10.2307/1381237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variation in White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Populations in Western Maryland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to the red deer (Bergmann, 1976;Kleymann, 1976a, b); Bergmann and Moser, 1985;Pemberton et al, 1988;Hartl et al, 1990aHartl et al, , 1991, the fallow deer (Pemberton and Smith, 1985;; Randi and Apollonio, 1988; Herzog, 1989), the moose (Ryman et al, 1977(Ryman et al, , 1980(Ryman et al, , 1981Reuterwall, 1980), the reindeer (R 0 ed et al, 1985;Røed, 1985aRøed, , b, 1986Røed, , 1987 and the white-tailed deer (Manlove et al, 1975(Manlove et al, , 1976Baccus et al, 1977;Johns et al, 1977;Ramsey et al, 1979;Chesser et al, 1982;Smith et al, 1983;Sheffield et al, 1985;Breshears et al, 1988) the factors influencing the amount and distribution of biochemical genetic variation in one of the most abundant European deer species, the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), are only poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to the red deer (Bergmann, 1976;Kleymann, 1976a, b); Bergmann and Moser, 1985;Pemberton et al, 1988;Hartl et al, 1990aHartl et al, , 1991, the fallow deer (Pemberton and Smith, 1985;; Randi and Apollonio, 1988; Herzog, 1989), the moose (Ryman et al, 1977(Ryman et al, , 1980(Ryman et al, , 1981Reuterwall, 1980), the reindeer (R 0 ed et al, 1985;Røed, 1985aRøed, , b, 1986Røed, , 1987 and the white-tailed deer (Manlove et al, 1975(Manlove et al, , 1976Baccus et al, 1977;Johns et al, 1977;Ramsey et al, 1979;Chesser et al, 1982;Smith et al, 1983;Sheffield et al, 1985;Breshears et al, 1988) the factors influencing the amount and distribution of biochemical genetic variation in one of the most abundant European deer species, the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), are only poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various multilocus investigations have been carried out within the past decade to evaluate the amount of genetic diversity within and among populations of white-tailed deer (Manlove et a!., 1976;Ramsey et a!., 1979;Baccus et a!., 1983;Smith et al, 1984Smith et al, , 1986Sheffield et a!., 1985), fallow deer (Pemberton and Smith, 1985;Harti et a!., 1986), wild and semi-domestic reindeer (RØed, 1985a, b;, moose (Ryman et a!., 1977(Ryman et a!., , 1980 and different subspecies of red deer (Cameron and Vyse, 1978;Gyllensten et a!., 1983;Baccus et a!., 1983;Dratch and Gyllensten, 1985;Hart!, 1986). In contrast the level of genetic variability in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.), one of the most abundant species in Central Europe, is largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, levels of heterozygosity have been associated with individual and population characteristics such as number of antler points, body size and various reproductive parameters (summarized by Smith et al, 1982, andSmith et al, 1984). Genetic differences exist within the species over long and short distances (Erickson, 1979;Manlove, 1979;Ramsey et al, 1979;Hillestad, 1984;Smith et al, 1984;Sheffield et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%