Genetic variation in Tunisia in the context of human diversity worldwide

Abstract

ObjectivesNorth Africa has a complex demographic history of migrations from within Africa, Europe, and the Middle East. However, population genetic studies, especially for autosomal genetic markers, are few relative to other world regions. We examined autosomal markers for eight Tunisian and Libyan populations in order to place them in a global context.Materials and MethodsData were collected by TaqMan on 399 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms on 331 individuals from Tunisia and Libya. These data were combined with data on the same SNPs previously typed on 2585 individuals from 57 populations from around the world. Where meaningful, close by SNPs were combined into multiallelic haplotypes. Data were evaluated by clustering, principal components, and population tree analyses. For a subset of 102 SNPs, data from the literature on seven additional North African populations were included in analyses.ResultsAverage heterozygosity of the North African populations is high relative to our global samples, consistent with a complex demographic history. The Tunisian and Libyan samples form a discrete cluster in the global and regional views and can be separated from sub‐Sahara, Middle East, and Europe. Within Tunisia the Nebeur and Smar are outlier groups. Across North Africa, pervasive East‐West geographical patterns were not found.DiscussionKnown historical migrations and invasions did not displace or homogenize the genetic variation in the region but rather enriched it. Even a small region like Tunisia contains considerable genetic diversity. Future studies across North Africa have the potential to increase our understanding of the historical demographic factors influencing the region. Am J Phys Anthropol 161:62–71, 2016. © 2016 The Authors American Journal of Physical Anthropology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Evaluating 130 microhaplotypes across a global set of 83 populations

“…At K = 7 and K = 8 the results with the highest likelihoods (not shown) had essentially the same pattern except for the European populations showing two and three, respectively, partial "ancestries" per population. There is a cline in those additional contributors from Southwest Asia to Northern Europe, consistent with what is seen for panels of single SNPs [4,22] that provide greater biogeographic resolution than seen for these 83 populations using microhaplotypes. Of particular interest is the obvious admixture of the 1000 Genomes populations from the Americas that are plotted at the far right.…”

Increasing the reference populations for the 55 AISNP panel: the need and benefits

“…The 55 AISNP panel now shows that an additional cluster is defined by the North African populations recently included [5], consistent with the findings based on many more SNPs, that these North African populations form a genetically distinct cluster [11]. The large number of additional East Asian populations begins to show variation among the populations with Tibetans and other ethnic groups from Southwest China having a pattern of ancestral similarity that is quite visually distinct.…”

Evaluating a subset of ancestry informative SNPs for discriminating among Southwest Asian and circum-Mediterranean populations

“…This area has been interesting to many researchers for different purposes e.g. biomedical genetic association, evolutionary and forensic studies [6,12,[20][21][22]. The 55 AISNP panel is an efficient and globally useful panel of ancestry informative markers that is comprised of highly informative SNPs for differentiation of at least eight ancestry groups including Europe, Southwest Asia, and South Asia [7,15].…”