2010
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-249722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation in the folate metabolic pathway and risk of childhood leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
63
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(80 reference statements)
6
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only three previous studies have investigated maternal folate pathway genotype in relation to ALL risk; two found that the child's genotype was more closely associated with risk than the mother's (19,35), while Lupo and colleagues found more associations with the mother's than the child's genotype (17). In our study, the findings for the child's genotype were generally consistent with those for maternal genotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only three previous studies have investigated maternal folate pathway genotype in relation to ALL risk; two found that the child's genotype was more closely associated with risk than the mother's (19,35), while Lupo and colleagues found more associations with the mother's than the child's genotype (17). In our study, the findings for the child's genotype were generally consistent with those for maternal genotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The UKCCS reported null associations with MTHFR 677C>T and 1298A>C for both Band T-cell ALL (19), while Tong and colleagues reported evidence of a protective association between MTHFR 677TT genotype and both ALL subtypes (52). We found no evidence of associations between either SNP and B-cell ALL, and only weak evidence that the MTHFR 677TT genotype was associated with an elevated risk of T-cell ALL.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further analysis stratified by cancer type showed 1420T allele was associated with a minor decreased risk only in leukemia, suggesting 1420T allele might be a protective factor for leukemia. It should be noted that the four relative small studies (Skibola et al, 2002;de Jonge et al, 2009;Lightfoot et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2011) with only 1572 cases and 1739 controls had driven the borderline inverse association, which may be due to selection bias. In stratifying analysis by source of control, the association between 1420T allele and reduced risk of cancer was significant in HB subgroup but not in PB subgroup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%