2013
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation and structure in Scandinavian red deer (Cervus elaphus): influence of ancestry, past hunting, and restoration management

Abstract: In the 19th century, the red deer (Cervus elaphus) population in Sweden experienced a rapid decline in numbers and distribution. A small population was, however, remnant in the southernmost province (Skåne) of the country, presumably corresponding to the nominate form of red deer (Cervus elaphus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758). After management, reintroductions, and supplementary release during the 20th century the Swedish C. elaphus population recovered. The recovery was partially uncontrolled, and included introduct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Höglund et al . ), population genetic measures like those of AR and H e were higher than SS‐10RS/SS‐35 specific panels, while F IS was lower. A similar trend was observed in relation to our panel of ten most polymorphic species‐specific loci (SS‐10MP), suggesting that cross‐specific amplification of microsatellites produces an ascertainment bias in the overall levels of genetic variability, when compared with randomly selected specific markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Höglund et al . ), population genetic measures like those of AR and H e were higher than SS‐10RS/SS‐35 specific panels, while F IS was lower. A similar trend was observed in relation to our panel of ten most polymorphic species‐specific loci (SS‐10MP), suggesting that cross‐specific amplification of microsatellites produces an ascertainment bias in the overall levels of genetic variability, when compared with randomly selected specific markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The studied fenced and managed population (PE) showed significant higher allelic richness and observed heterozygosity than the DN and FG/CP populations and nonsignificant differences with respect to CB (see Supporting information, Fig. The admixture of founder individuals from different geographical regions has been related to increased genetic diversity in isolated and captive red deer populations (Haanes et al, 2010;Höglund et al, 2013) and can explain this high genetic variability. Several explanations are possible for this observation.…”
Section: Structure and Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several explanations are possible for this observation. The admixture of founder individuals from different geographical regions has been related to increased genetic diversity in isolated and captive red deer populations (Haanes et al, 2010;Höglund et al, 2013) and can explain this high genetic variability. Moreover, the tendency of balanced sex ratios and age structures in fenced estates These factors (initial heterozygosity and Ne), together with the generation interval, have been noted as the principal drivers maintaining genetic diversity (Frankham, 1995).…”
Section: Structure and Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA from all these samples was extracted and analyzed originally for other studies [17,18]. We were given full permission to use the extracts.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%