“…It is also important to stress that although the work of Krakau et al (2012) was carried out in several localities at a large spatial scale showing high values of genetic diversity in the northern populations, comparisons among different lagoons and several localities inside each lagoon were not included; the authors did not consider the analysis of microgeographic genetic variation in C. edule, assuming genetic homogeneity inside each sampled coastal bay, estuary or lagoon Sequences of a particular fragment of the mitochondrial COI have been employed in a number of studies to investigate genetic structuring and demographic history in populations of marine bivalve species, in which the observed values of haplotype diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (p) were lower than those recorded for C. edule in the present study. For example, lower diversity values were recorded in other bivalve species: Amusium pleuronectes with h ¼ 0.237, p ¼ 0.0006 (Mahidol et al, 2007), Ruditapes decussatus at h ¼ 0.486 and p ¼ 0.011 (Gharbi et al, 2010), Scrobicularia plana with h ¼ 0.52, p ¼ 0.0016 (Santos et al, 2012), Donax serra with h ¼ 0.30, p ¼ 0.001 (Bezuidenhout et al, 2014), Crassostrea iredalei with h ¼ 0.565, p ¼ 0.0018 (Zainal Abidin et al, 2014) and Gemma gemma with values of h ¼ 0.314, p ¼ 0.0012 (Zhang et al, 2014). In our study of C. edule, estimates of haplotype and nucleotide diversity were higher than those recorded in these studies using marine samples.…”