1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00985819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation and natural hybridization betweenOrchis laxiflora andOrchis palustris (Orchidaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, studies of these orchids have mainly focused on strictly related, hybridizing species by evaluating the strength of inviability and/or sterility of their hybrid progenies, which is the nature of post-zygotic barriers (Arduino et al 1996;Pellegrino et al 2005;Cozzolino et al 2006). In this context, sympatric food-deceptive species pairs for which natural hybrids have never been observed represent a suitable model to explore whether their reproductive isolation depends upon pre-or postpollination mechanisms, or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, studies of these orchids have mainly focused on strictly related, hybridizing species by evaluating the strength of inviability and/or sterility of their hybrid progenies, which is the nature of post-zygotic barriers (Arduino et al 1996;Pellegrino et al 2005;Cozzolino et al 2006). In this context, sympatric food-deceptive species pairs for which natural hybrids have never been observed represent a suitable model to explore whether their reproductive isolation depends upon pre-or postpollination mechanisms, or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were interpreted as the consequence of habitat fragmentation, inbreeding, founder effects, and genetic drift. However, widespread and outbreeding orchids without a known history of population fragmentation showed similarly high genetic differentiation among populations, including Cypripedium parviflorum (G ST ϭ 0.23, Wallace and Case 2000), Orchis laxiflora (G ST ϭ 0.12, Arduino et al 1996), and Tolumnia variegata (G ST ϭ 0.11, Ackerman and Ward 1999). These values, together with those reported by Hamrick and Godt (1996) for 16 orchid species (mean G ST ϭ 0.087), are consistently higher than those found within Ophrys.…”
Section: Fig 4 Genotype Assignment Tests Based On Cavalli-sforza's mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect it is worth noting that while orchid species share biological attributes such as small, mostly dust-like seeds, they are also a large, heterogeneous and diverse group (Arditti, 1992;Rudall and Bateman, 2002). The Orchidaceae contains ca 19 000 species encompassing an exceptionally wide range of reproductive strategies, variation in generation times, and includes both narrow endemic and widespread species, Rossi et al (1992);8, Case (1993);9, Case (1994); 10, Arduino et al (1995);11, Peakall and James (1995); 12, Arduino et al (1996); 13, Peakall and Beattie (1996);14, Sharma and Jones (1996);15, Sun (1996); 16, Hollingsworth and Dickson (1997); 17, Reinhammar and Hedrén (1997); 18, Arft and Ranker (1998);19, Case et al (1998);20, Aagaard et al (1999); 21, Ackerman and Ward (1999);22, Nielsen and Siegismund (1999); 23, Thornhill (1999);24, Wong and Sun (1999); 25, Alexandersson and Å gren (2000); 26, Chung and Chung (2000); 27, Ehlers and Pedersen (2000) . We have not attempted to standardise here as in some cases the raw data are unavailable, and there is also a strong correlation between measures.…”
Section: Population Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%