2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00199-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous reports have suggested a relationship between PROP taste sensitivity and density of fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, with PROP tasters having a greater number of papillae that hold functional taste cells compared to nontasters (3,6,47,120,142). Higher papillae number and density have been hypothesized to contribute to heightened overall responsiveness to a range of basic tastes (e.g., bitter, sweet, salty) and textures (e.g., fat texture) in PROP tasters relative to nontasters (47,110,113). However, not all studies have demonstrated an association between fungiform papillae density and ratings of PROP bitterness (52,56), suggesting that this relationship is not straightforward.…”
Section: Genetics Underlying the Prop Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous reports have suggested a relationship between PROP taste sensitivity and density of fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, with PROP tasters having a greater number of papillae that hold functional taste cells compared to nontasters (3,6,47,120,142). Higher papillae number and density have been hypothesized to contribute to heightened overall responsiveness to a range of basic tastes (e.g., bitter, sweet, salty) and textures (e.g., fat texture) in PROP tasters relative to nontasters (47,110,113). However, not all studies have demonstrated an association between fungiform papillae density and ratings of PROP bitterness (52,56), suggesting that this relationship is not straightforward.…”
Section: Genetics Underlying the Prop Phenotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 11 subjects were all right-handed [average handedness score of 84 according to the modified Edinburgh inventory (Oldfield 1971)]; 3 were men and 8 women, with a mean age of 26 and mean education of 17 yr. Taster status was evaluated by having subjects rate the intensity of 6-npropylthiouracil (PROP) with the general labeled magnitude scale (Green et al 1996). All subjects were average tasters with a mean PROP rating of 38 (Prutkin et al 2000).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study, we believe that we have stabilized the PTC perception by using the NaCl standard. In fact, similar methods were also used by some other studies in the literature (Dicarlo and Powers, 1998;Tepper et al, 2001;Bartoshuk et al 1996;Prutkin et al, 2000;Prescott et al, 2004). Again, to ensure individuals' perception of taste, tap water is also used as well as NaCl solution to provide better comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%