2017
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1336225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variants and clinical relevance associated with gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women: a case-control study

Abstract: We found that four SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity may also increase the risk of developing GDM in the Chinese population. Among these SNPs, we report for the first time that rs945508 in ARHGEF11, rs10804591 in PLXND1 and rs10245353 in NFE2L3 were associated with GDM.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such studies are highly prevalent in the field of pregnancy complication studies, the analysis of candidate gene lists is more comprehensive and provides a high-level snapshot of the major molecular pathways and biological processes involved in the pathogenesis of traits. On the other hand, candidate gene studies are prone to high false positive rates, and most of the genotype-level associations reported in literature have weak statistical support (with a large proportion of studies reporting association p-values between 0.01 and 0.05 (e.g., [13,14]).…”
Section: Pregnancy Complications and Strategies For Their Genetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such studies are highly prevalent in the field of pregnancy complication studies, the analysis of candidate gene lists is more comprehensive and provides a high-level snapshot of the major molecular pathways and biological processes involved in the pathogenesis of traits. On the other hand, candidate gene studies are prone to high false positive rates, and most of the genotype-level associations reported in literature have weak statistical support (with a large proportion of studies reporting association p-values between 0.01 and 0.05 (e.g., [13,14]).…”
Section: Pregnancy Complications and Strategies For Their Genetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies of genetic analysis, such as candidate gene, genome-wide association, and linkage studies, have been applied in different populations to identify genetic variants (including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) associated with pregnancy complications [8][9][10][11][12]. Candidate gene analysis usually involves one or several pre-selected genetic variants that are tested in a small cohort of samples (usually, up to 1000) (e.g., [13,14]). Such studies can sensitively identify association between genetic changes and complex traits; however, they are prone to false positive results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asia is the largest and most occupied continent (60% of the world's population), with an increasing prevalence of GDM [4], with 30% of this population encompassing the Eastern and Southeastern subregions [5], which contribute approximately 80% to the Asian economy. The prevalence of GDM among Asian countries varies depending on the population characteristics such as maternal age, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, body composition, screening approaches, diagnostic benchmarks [6], presence of T2DM [7], and genetic factors, as well [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global prevalence of GDM varies widely, from 1% to 28%, depending on population characteristics (e.g., maternal age, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, or body composition), screening methods, and diagnostic criteria [ 10 ]. In addition, as with the common form of type 2 diabetes [ 11 ], GDM can also be influenced by genetic factors, which may differently affect disease prevalence among populations [ 12 ]. To date, at least 8 associations have developed their own diagnostic criteria for GDM, namely, the American Diabetes Association (ADA 2004, 2007, 2010, and 2012), Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS), Carpenter-Coustan (CC), International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG), National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG), and World Health Organization (WHO 1998, 1999, 2006, and 2013) [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%