1963
DOI: 10.2527/jas1963.223654x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variance Component Analysis of Litter Size and Weaning Weight of New Zealand White Rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
2
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the parity class of dam effect was never a significant source of variation. In contrast to the present results, Rollins et al (1963) found parity class of dam to influence litter size and total weight at 56 d. Rouvier et al (1973) reported parity effects for litter size, survival rate, and total litter and average fryer weight at 56 d. In addition, Lukefahr et al (1983~) reported parity influences on litter feed intake, feed efficiency, and litter weight at 56 d. The 7 0 d end-point trait performances measured in the present study, as opposed to 5 6 d performances reported in the literature, may have been less influenced by residual maternal effects of parity. For average market weight per fryer, the sex effect approached significance (P < .13), with males tending to weigh more than females (2,063 vs The overall linear covariate of litter size at weaning was related (P < .01) positively to litter weaning weight, total feed intake, weight gain, and market weight at 70 d and negatively to litter feed efficiency (Tables 2 and 3); however, within-breed-type regressions were never significantly different.…”
Section: Results and Dlscussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the parity class of dam effect was never a significant source of variation. In contrast to the present results, Rollins et al (1963) found parity class of dam to influence litter size and total weight at 56 d. Rouvier et al (1973) reported parity effects for litter size, survival rate, and total litter and average fryer weight at 56 d. In addition, Lukefahr et al (1983~) reported parity influences on litter feed intake, feed efficiency, and litter weight at 56 d. The 7 0 d end-point trait performances measured in the present study, as opposed to 5 6 d performances reported in the literature, may have been less influenced by residual maternal effects of parity. For average market weight per fryer, the sex effect approached significance (P < .13), with males tending to weigh more than females (2,063 vs The overall linear covariate of litter size at weaning was related (P < .01) positively to litter weaning weight, total feed intake, weight gain, and market weight at 70 d and negatively to litter feed efficiency (Tables 2 and 3); however, within-breed-type regressions were never significantly different.…”
Section: Results and Dlscussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…0194) for pre-weaning mortality in Giza White rabbits suggests that selection for decreased mortality to weaning should be effective in this breed. This estimate appears to be higher than the estimate of 0-12 obtained by Rollins, Casady, Sittmann and Sittmann (1963) for New Zealand White rabbits.…”
Section: Components Of Variance and Heritability Estimatescontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Paradoxically, due to the experimental sensitivity involved in this large data set, these differences were statistically significant, although the biological importance is questionable. Unlike in most domestic livestock species, the sex effect does not strongly influence weaning-to-market growth and carcass characters in rabbits (Rollins et al, 1963;Vogt, 1979;Lukefahr and Ozimba, 1991;Ozimba and Lukefahr, 1991). In addition, a significant breed x sex interaction was detected for GAIN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%