2015
DOI: 10.4238/2015.december.16.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability of DNA repair mechanisms in chemotherapy treatment outcome of gastric cancer patients

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We investigate whether three common polymorphisms in ERCC1 and ERCC2 are predictor factors for the chemotherapy response, as well as the clinic outcome of patients with gastric cancer. Between May 2011 and May 2013, 263 patients with gastric cancer who were newly diagnosed by histopathology were enrolled in our study. Genotyping of the ERCC1 rs11615 and rs3212986, and ERCC2 rs1799793 polymorphisms were conducted by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Bai et al 16 discovered that patients carrying the GT and TT genotypes of rs3212986 showed a significantly poorer response to chemotherapy than did those carrying the GG genotype. In contrast to them, Zhong et al’s 17 research showed no significant association between ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism and GC, which was consistent with our conclusions. Considering the reason, this may result from the complicated and multistep process and NER pathway factors might play an important role in functioning jointly to alter clinical outcome of GC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Bai et al 16 discovered that patients carrying the GT and TT genotypes of rs3212986 showed a significantly poorer response to chemotherapy than did those carrying the GG genotype. In contrast to them, Zhong et al’s 17 research showed no significant association between ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism and GC, which was consistent with our conclusions. Considering the reason, this may result from the complicated and multistep process and NER pathway factors might play an important role in functioning jointly to alter clinical outcome of GC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…1 Homozygous model (TT vs CC) . A total of 8 studies [ 12 – 15 , 19 , 21 , 24 , 34 ] involving 1569 patients were included in the homozygous model. There were 3 studies on ovarian cancer, 2 on osteosarcoma, 2 on gastric cancer, and 1 on esophageal cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Heterozygous model (CT vs CC) . A total of 7 studies [ 12 , 13 , 15 , 19 , 21 , 24 , 34 ] involving 1360 patients were included in the homozygous model. Heterozygous model (CT vs CC): I 2 = 40.1%, fixed effect model was used, HR = 1.22, 95% CI (0.95,1.57), P = 0.115, as shown in Fig 11(E) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERCC1 protein is involved in the DNA damage incision process and ERCC2 in the damage unwinding process. Polymorphisms in ERCC1 and ERCC2 could alter the ability to repair DNA, thereby affecting the response or survival of cancer patients [ 65 ]. Two studies included in this review reported a significant association of the ERCC1 rs11615, ERCC1 rs10412761, and ERCC2 rs1799787 SNPs with response to neoadjuvant capecitabine-based chemoradiation in European ancestry patients (Spain, France) [ 24 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%