2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-014-1256-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability and predicted genetic gains for yield and laticifer system traits of rubber tree families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature also shows plant breeding projects in which base populations were composed of a small number of progenies without compromising their genetic variability. This finding is also confirmed by Gouvea et al (2013) and Oliveira et al (2014), who studied initial populations consisting of 22 and 30 progenies of rubber tree, respectively, and in studies by Fogaça et al (2012), in which the base population consisted of 24 progenies of daylily (Hemerocallis x hybrids Hort.). It should be remembered that one of the limiting factors of allocating a large number of progenies in experiments of perennial crops is the maintenance cost of this population during the 365 days of the year.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The literature also shows plant breeding projects in which base populations were composed of a small number of progenies without compromising their genetic variability. This finding is also confirmed by Gouvea et al (2013) and Oliveira et al (2014), who studied initial populations consisting of 22 and 30 progenies of rubber tree, respectively, and in studies by Fogaça et al (2012), in which the base population consisted of 24 progenies of daylily (Hemerocallis x hybrids Hort.). It should be remembered that one of the limiting factors of allocating a large number of progenies in experiments of perennial crops is the maintenance cost of this population during the 365 days of the year.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The domestication of rubber tree starts directly from Wickham collections without interspecific hybridization. The difficulty to dissect the component traits of yield as well as the long asexual period, however, make the traditional breeding process of rubber tree time-consuming (>20–25 years) 14 , resulting in less than four times of manual guidance sexual recombinations in Hevea cultivars within 150 years to date. Nevertheless, the individual with favorite traits can easily be retained and propagated by bud grafting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the species continues to be exploited and rubber extracted in natural populations in the Amazon region, there are very few areas with high levels of productivity. These areas are based on the system proposed by Kageyama et al (2002) and the increased productivity is due to the selection of genotypes, initially conserved ex situ (OLIVEIRA et al, 2015;SOUZA et al, 2017), that enabled planting in a variety of agroecosystems, such as agroforestry (RIGHI et al, 2008;VIRGENS FILHO, 2014) and monocultures (GONÇALVES et al, 2011). However, successful domestication occurred outside of the species' center of origin in ecosystems where the fungus Microcylus ulei (Henn,) Arx does not occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%