2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic typing of recent classical swine fever isolates from India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance (PD-ADMAS), Bangalore, India, has ranked CSF among the top five viral diseases of the livestock in India (Patil et al 2012). Phylogenetic analysis on limited available isolates showed, mostly, subgenotype 1.1. circulating in domestic pigs throughout the country, while the emerging subgenotype 2.2. was also reported circulating in the pig populations of north-east India (Patil et al 2010). However, the studies on molecular epidemiology of CSFV in India are still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Project Directorate on Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveillance (PD-ADMAS), Bangalore, India, has ranked CSF among the top five viral diseases of the livestock in India (Patil et al 2012). Phylogenetic analysis on limited available isolates showed, mostly, subgenotype 1.1. circulating in domestic pigs throughout the country, while the emerging subgenotype 2.2. was also reported circulating in the pig populations of north-east India (Patil et al 2010). However, the studies on molecular epidemiology of CSFV in India are still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The involvement of subgroup 2.2 viruses from Karnataka, in one of the CSF outbreaks in Harohalli, near Bangalore during the year 2008 was reported by Patil et al [14]. Later Chakroborthy et al [2] recovered three isolates from Bangalore district, further confirmed the presence of 2.2 subgroup viruses in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Present and previous studies of genetic typing [15] in Karnataka had indicated that there has been a switch in virus populations from subgroup 1.1 to 2.2 after 2008 and 2.2 viruses has dominated the field infections. Even though subgroup 1.1 viruses were predominant in India, the subgroup 2.2 viruses are gradually spreading as confirmed by frequent detection/ isolation of subgroup 2.2 viruses in the recent years, particularly from the northern India [14,15] and neighbouring country like Nepal [18]. During 2012-13, the prevalence of subgroup 2.2 isolates was also reported from Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, Orissa, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh states (Unpublished data from NIVEDI, Bangalore).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations