The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.768393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Transformation of Apomictic Grasses: Progress and Constraints

Abstract: The available methods for plant transformation and expansion beyond its limits remain especially critical for crop improvement. For grass species, this is even more critical, mainly due to drawbacks in in vitro regeneration. Despite the existence of many protocols in grasses to achieve genetic transformation through Agrobacterium or biolistic gene delivery, their efficiencies are genotype-dependent and still very low due to the recalcitrance of these species to in vitro regeneration. Many plant transformation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As contamination is a major problem with no easy solution when explants are taken from greenhouse-grown plants, in vitro-produced aseptic plants were used to work around the issue of contamination (Leifert et al 1994 ). Importantly, the use of in vitro clonally propagated plantlets as the explant donor allows for maintenance of genotype fidelity, which, barring apomictic grass species (Bellido et al 2021 ), would be lost if seed-derived explants were used. Finally, the in vitro plants are much smaller in size than greenhouse-grown plants, and thus require less greenhouse space for plant maintenance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As contamination is a major problem with no easy solution when explants are taken from greenhouse-grown plants, in vitro-produced aseptic plants were used to work around the issue of contamination (Leifert et al 1994 ). Importantly, the use of in vitro clonally propagated plantlets as the explant donor allows for maintenance of genotype fidelity, which, barring apomictic grass species (Bellido et al 2021 ), would be lost if seed-derived explants were used. Finally, the in vitro plants are much smaller in size than greenhouse-grown plants, and thus require less greenhouse space for plant maintenance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the most common definitions of in planta transformation have been (i) a means of transformation without tissue culture step [5,7] and (ii) a means of transformation of intact plants or plant tissues without callus culture or regeneration [14,15]. In our opinion, these definitions are incomplete and not nuanced enough to take into account the broad diversity of available in planta methods.…”
Section: Definition Of In Planta Stable Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developing of GnEd systems in a nongenetic model plants is challenging (Shan et al 2020). Major bottlenecks for GnEd in tropical forage grasses include the large and usually polyploid genomes of these species whose sequences are not available for most of them (Simeão et al 2021), and the inexistency or inefficiency of transformation protocols for a number of these species (Bellido et al 2021). Thus, more scientific developments are needed for GnEd of tropical forage grasses be able to significantly contribute with improvements in animal production.…”
Section: Gned To Improve the Production And Quality Of Tropical Pasturesmentioning
confidence: 99%