2018
DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Tools for Coronary Risk Assessment in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study From the ACCORD Clinical Trial

Abstract: OBJECTIVEWe evaluated whether the increasing number of genetic loci for coronary artery disease (CAD) identified in the general population could be used to predict the risk of major CAD events (MCE) among participants with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA weighted genetic risk score (GRS) derived from 204 variants representative of all the 160 CAD loci identified in the general population as of December 2017 was calculated in 5,360 and 1,931 white participants in the Act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in our angiographic cohort where the duration of type 2 diabetes is generally long and usage of lipid-lowering drugs is prevalent, high LDL is not associated with multivessel stenosis (OR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.59-1.61; p = 0.91). In contrast, the genetic mechanisms likely remain persistent and have been shown to be promising in identifying individuals with type 2 diabetes at a high CHD risk [36,37]. In this study, we show that a CHD PRS, capturing more genetic risk than previous genetic risk scores, maintains its association.…”
Section: A Chd Prs Could Potentially Help To Identify Individuals Witmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For instance, in our angiographic cohort where the duration of type 2 diabetes is generally long and usage of lipid-lowering drugs is prevalent, high LDL is not associated with multivessel stenosis (OR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.59-1.61; p = 0.91). In contrast, the genetic mechanisms likely remain persistent and have been shown to be promising in identifying individuals with type 2 diabetes at a high CHD risk [36,37]. In this study, we show that a CHD PRS, capturing more genetic risk than previous genetic risk scores, maintains its association.…”
Section: A Chd Prs Could Potentially Help To Identify Individuals Witmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In a large-scale study of CAD risk prediction in T2D patients, adding a weighted GRS comprised of 204 CAD candidate SNPs to a model of 13 clinical predictors such as age, sex, history of CAD, smoking habits, and SBP lead to an 8% improvement in risk classification. However, the AUCs of the models did not appear to be good enough to distinguish high- and low-risk individuals (i.e., genetic 0.567, clinical 0.675, combined 0.681), and all participants were of European ancestry [ 29 ]. Recently, the issue of limited generalizability of European derived PRS has been raised, and the importance of developing PRS specific to non-European populations is emphasized [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts based on this approach were initially disappointing due to the small number of genetic markers that were available when these studies were carried out and the rudimental way in which predictive performance was measured ( 18 ). However, more recent studies, taking full advantage of the abundant crop of CHD loci identified to date, indicate that this strategy can be effective ( 19 21 ).…”
Section: Leveraging Genetics To Develop Predictive Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among white subjects in this cohort ( n = 5,360), a GRS based on all 204 SNPs reported in Fig. 2 (GRS 204 ) was strongly associated with a positive CVD history at study entry (OR per GRS 204 SD 1.40, 95% CI 1.32–1.49, P = 3 × 10 −27 ) as well as with an increased risk of major CHD events during follow-up (average follow-up length 4.9 years; hazard ratio [HR] per GRS 204 SD 1.27, 95% CI 1.18–1.37, P = 4 × 10 −10 ) ( 19 ). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Leveraging Genetics To Develop Predictive Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation