2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9648-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone

Abstract: It is unknown whether or why genetic test reporting confers benefits in the understanding and management of cancer risk beyond what patients learn from counseling based on family history. A prospective nonexperimental control group study compared participants from melanoma-prone families who underwent CDKN2A/p16 (p16) genetic testing (27 carriers, 38 noncarriers) to participants from equivalently melanoma-prone families known not to carry a deleterious p16 mutation (31 no-test controls). All participants recei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 18 remaining participants came from 11 families. Eight of these families (72.7%) included a parent who had participated in one of our prior studies in which genetic test results for melanoma risk were reported (Aspinwall et al 2013b; Taber et al 2015). In five families (45.5%), one parent had a prior melanoma diagnosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 18 remaining participants came from 11 families. Eight of these families (72.7%) included a parent who had participated in one of our prior studies in which genetic test results for melanoma risk were reported (Aspinwall et al 2013b; Taber et al 2015). In five families (45.5%), one parent had a prior melanoma diagnosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will pose an increasing challenge on the counseling geneticists since specialists in one particular disease context are then supposed to potentially interpret up to genome-wide data and decide on whether or not to report findings affecting all kinds of diseases back to the respective individuals [86]. While first studies suggest that affected individuals might not undergo major crises [87] or could even benefit from better risk information [88,89], potential longtime implications regarding insurance, employment, and stigmatization [90] require further attention.…”
Section: Are Filters a Solution?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic testing of appropriate individuals and the tailored follow-up recommendations that ensue can improve early detection, reduce mortality, and enhance compliance with prevention recommendations [4, 5]. Furthermore, if the highest-risk individuals are selectively screened and treated before expensive systemic therapies are required, costs can be reduced and productive years of life can be increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%