2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic syndromes mimic congenital infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reports since then confirm that IFNa is elevated in AGS patients and is often used in the diagnosis of this disease (Dimova and Mikova, 2005;Goutières et al, 1998;Kothare et al, 2006;Lanzi et al, 2002Lanzi et al, , 2005Rasmussen et al, 2005;Sanchis et al, 2005). Using a multiplexed luminex assay, we were able to confirm that IFNa is elevated in the CSF of AGS patients and that this increase is statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several reports since then confirm that IFNa is elevated in AGS patients and is often used in the diagnosis of this disease (Dimova and Mikova, 2005;Goutières et al, 1998;Kothare et al, 2006;Lanzi et al, 2002Lanzi et al, , 2005Rasmussen et al, 2005;Sanchis et al, 2005). Using a multiplexed luminex assay, we were able to confirm that IFNa is elevated in the CSF of AGS patients and that this increase is statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Radiological imaging and neuropathology features of AGS include calcifications of the basal ganglia and white matter destruction (Goutieres, 2005;Lanzi et al, 2002;Rice et al, 2007b). Because these symptoms are also manifestations of congenital infection with TORCH agents (toxoplasmosis, other viruses such as HIV, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus [HSV]) (Malm and Engman, 2007;Sanchis et al, 2005), the diagnosis of AGS is confirmed after exclusion of these etiologies. The prevalence of AGS is possibly underestimated due to misdiagnosis of microbial infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarification of the genetic basis of AGS and expansion of the AGS phenotype [Stephenson et al, 1997;Crow et al, 2000Crow et al, , 2003Sanchis et al, 2005;Rice et al, 2007] suggests that this distinction is not appropriate so that the previous OMIM entry for pseudo-TORCH syndrome (251290) has been withdrawn and moved to the AGS (225750) entry. However, we note that a number of other congenital infection-like phenotypes, obviously distinct from AGS, have also been described [e.g., Slee et al, 1999;Vivarelli et al, 2001;Knoblauch et al, 2003;Gardner et al, 2005;Watts et al, 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Case 2, it was related to parvovirus infection and the fetus received repeated transfusions [7,8]. In Case 1, a congenital viral infection was also suspected but no infectious agent could be identified, raising the possibility of a pseudo-TORCH syndrome [9][10][11][12]. The GRACILE syndrome, which combines Growth Retardation, Aminoaciduria, Cholestasis, Iron overload, Lactacidosis and Early death, was excluded by genetic screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%