2007
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic surveillance of endemic bovine Salmonella Infantis infection

Abstract: Background: Salmonella serovar Infantis is endemic in Finnish food-producing animals since the 1970s. The purpose of this study was to describe the molecular epidemiology of the infection in cattle during , to follow the persistence of the feed-related outbreak strain from 1995 in the cattle population, and to analyse the stability of XbaI-banding patterns in individual herds during long-lasting infections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the European Union (EU), S. Infantis has been the third most common serovar in humans since 2006 with a relative share between 1% and 2% (EFSA, 2019). Although this serovar is prevalent also in pigs and cattle (Rajic et al, 2005;Lindqvist and Pelkonen, 2007), poultry especially broiler and their products have been identified as one of the most important sources of human infection with S. Infantis (EFSA, 2019(EFSA, , 2020. In 2018, S. Infantis was the most frequently reported serovar in fowl in the EU (EFSA, 2019), accounting for 36.7% of all Salmonella isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the European Union (EU), S. Infantis has been the third most common serovar in humans since 2006 with a relative share between 1% and 2% (EFSA, 2019). Although this serovar is prevalent also in pigs and cattle (Rajic et al, 2005;Lindqvist and Pelkonen, 2007), poultry especially broiler and their products have been identified as one of the most important sources of human infection with S. Infantis (EFSA, 2019(EFSA, , 2020. In 2018, S. Infantis was the most frequently reported serovar in fowl in the EU (EFSA, 2019), accounting for 36.7% of all Salmonella isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although epidemiological data would be needed to determine whether these clusters represent true single-source outbreaks, the observed patterns and the fact that four clusters represented PFGE types that were not identified outside a given cluster suggest that at least some of these clusters represent small outbreaks, possibly linked to localized sources, for example, restaurants (CDC, 2008b), group events where food is served (Camps et al, 2005), or even nonfood sources (CDC, 2008a). PFGE-based identification of single-source disease clusters and source tracking by PFGE is complicated by the fact that some PFGE types may be common and widely distributed (Woo, 2005;Lindqvist and Pelkonen, 2007). Identification of such a common PFGE type in multiple human or animal cases or among clinical cases and a possible source is more likely to be by chance and may sometimes not represent a causal relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is capable to differentiates some of the strains classified as same phage types and serotypes (Landeras et al, 1996 ; Liebana et al, 2001 , 2002a , b , 2004 ; Clark et al, 2003 ). Nevertheless, researchers have reported that some different phage types strains yet revealed indistinguishable ribotypes (Fontana et al, 2003 ; Adaska et al, 2006 ; Lindqvist and Pelkonen, 2007 ), particularly when compared to PFGE (Eriksson et al, 2005 ). Comparisons of ribotyping with PFGE are unusual because it depends on what were the enzymes applied for digestion and the population characteristics studied (Jeoffreys et al, 2001 ; Liebana et al, 2001 ; Fontana et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Genotypic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%