1996
DOI: 10.4141/cjps96-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic studies on net blotch resistance in a barley cross

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the resistance to the two forms of net blotch is inherited independently (Ho et al ., 1996), it is important that the pathogen is correctly identified. The main aim of this study was focused on the development of specific primers that differentiate spot form and net form isolates of the net blotch fungus P. teres from each other and also from P. graminea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the resistance to the two forms of net blotch is inherited independently (Ho et al ., 1996), it is important that the pathogen is correctly identified. The main aim of this study was focused on the development of specific primers that differentiate spot form and net form isolates of the net blotch fungus P. teres from each other and also from P. graminea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Canada and Egypt, one dominant gene for resistance was detected (Buchannon and McDonald 1965), whereas in Australia, Khan and Boyd (1969) identified 2 dominant resistance genes. More recently, numerous genes were identified in different barley lines from around the world (Wilcoxson et al 1992;Douiyssi et al 1996;Ho et al 1996;Afanasenko et al 1999;Jonsson et al 1999). A current study of barley genotypes using NTNB isolates from Western Australia, Queensland, and South Australia, has detected more than 6 genes for resistance (Gupta et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as proposed by Choo et al (1979) in a population improvement program for net blotch resistance, selection intensity could be higher because additive)additive epistasis for the evaluation parameters was predominantly complementary. Ho et al (1996) determined that resistance, under growth chamber conditions, to a specific isolate of P. teres (WRS102) at the three-leaf stage, was linked to the two-row phenotype on chromosome 2. Although the screening in this investigation was made at the adult plant stage, it is apparent that the two-row DH lines were associated with net blotch resistance at Mograne 2002Á2003 and Tunis greenhouse 2004 environments, but not at Mograne 2003Á2004 environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of spike type, which is controlled by a single gene, vrs1, (Vrs1Vrs1 for two-row type), on agronomic traits, chemical composition, and disease resistance was previously studied (Jui et al 1997;Fre´geau-Reid et al 2001;Choo et al 2004). For net blotch resistance, one resistance gene was shown to be linked to the Vrs1Vrs1 genotype on chromosome 2 (Ho et al 1996). However previously, Khan and Boyd (1969) reported that net blotch resistance segregates independently of spike type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%