2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-009-9915-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic structure of the Black Bog Ant (Formica picea Nylander) in the United Kingdom

Abstract: Social Hymenoptera have been relatively little studied in terms of conservation genetics even though their sociality and omplementary sex determination potentially influence the interaction of genetics with extinction risk. Using microsatellite markers, we investigated the social and genetic structure of nests and populations of the Black Bog Ant Formica picea at four sites in the UK, where this habitat specialist has a localized and fragmented range. Nests were weakly polygynous (effective queen number, 4–27 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…L. niger, C. herculeanus) to seemingly poor ones (see Vepsäläinen and Pisarski 1982). There is evidence that the dispersal of the mire ant Formica picea is weak, not only between different mires but also within mires (Mabelis and Chardon 2005;Rees et al 2010). In our data, this species seemed to be almost exclusively confined to pristine mires.…”
Section: Restoration and Antssupporting
confidence: 41%
“…L. niger, C. herculeanus) to seemingly poor ones (see Vepsäläinen and Pisarski 1982). There is evidence that the dispersal of the mire ant Formica picea is weak, not only between different mires but also within mires (Mabelis and Chardon 2005;Rees et al 2010). In our data, this species seemed to be almost exclusively confined to pristine mires.…”
Section: Restoration and Antssupporting
confidence: 41%
“…We conducted a literature search by species for traits potentially important to explain the elevation distribution of our species (Bernard, 1968;Della Santa, 1994; http://www.antweb.org/, Cherix & Higashi, 1979;Dethier & Cherix, 1982;Verhaege et al ., 1984;Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990;De Biseau & Couvreur, 1994;Seppa, 1994Seppa, , 1996Gertsch et al ., 1995;Dettorre et al ., 1997;Cherix et al ., 2006;Aron et al ., 2009;Rees et al ., 2010;Table S2). We found that potentially relevant traits had been measured in all of the species found in our transect; these traits were: (i) the social structure of the nest (monogyny vs. polygyny), (ii) the mean size of the workers of the species, (iii) the type of nest; built from vegetal debris or dug in the soil (Cherix et al ., 2006), and (iv) whether the nymph develops with or without a cocoon.…”
Section: Functional Trait Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rees et al. ). By contrast, the long‐range dispersal of females in monogynous species usually leads to no significant population viscosity (Chapuisat et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In these species, new colonies are frequently initiated by budding, a process whereby queens leave their parental nest with workers to initiate a new colony nearby (short-ranged dispersal). Several studies have revealed that limited dispersal of queens in polygynous species is frequently associated with significant population viscosity (Pamilo and Rosengren 1984 ; Seppä and Pamilo 1995 ; Chapuisat and Keller 1999 ; Giraud et al 2000 ; Liautard and Keller 2001 ; Fournier et al 2002 ; Rüppell et al 2003 ; Zhu et al 2003 ; Zinck et al 2007 ; Seppä et al 2009 ; Rees et al 2010 ). By contrast, the long-range dispersal of females in monogynous species usually leads to no significant population viscosity (Chapuisat et al 1997 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%