2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-012-1210-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic structure of declining chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) populations from South Shetland Islands (Antarctica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All population analyses agreed that there is high connectivity between King George Island, Orne Harbour, and Signy Island breeding colonies, complementing previous genetic work that found no differentiation within archipelagos (Korczak-Abshire et al 2012). The limited genetic structure detected can be explained by: (1) large effective population sizes of chinstrap colonies; (2) a recent population expansion; and (3) population intermixing through non-breeding dispersal.…”
Section: Regional Population Connectivitysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All population analyses agreed that there is high connectivity between King George Island, Orne Harbour, and Signy Island breeding colonies, complementing previous genetic work that found no differentiation within archipelagos (Korczak-Abshire et al 2012). The limited genetic structure detected can be explained by: (1) large effective population sizes of chinstrap colonies; (2) a recent population expansion; and (3) population intermixing through non-breeding dispersal.…”
Section: Regional Population Connectivitysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For chinstrap penguins, there has not been a region-wide investigation using microsatellite markers. Korczak-Abshire et al (2012) found no evidence of differentiation between colonies within the South Shetland Islands based on nuclear anonymous amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers, but this was over a very short distance of 32 km. There thus remains the possibility that population structuring exists between archipelagos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is important to note here that we are investigating population structure at the regional, not the local scale. At the local scale, where colonies are separated by tens of kilometers or are within the same archipelago, we would not expect to find population structure as members of all three of these species have been observed visiting nearby colonies at low rates19252627 and chinstrap penguins lack population structure at these scales28. Changes in the local conditions, such as increased sea ice or ice-bergs which block access to colonies, has been found to increase the chances of individual Adélie penguins visiting nearby colonies25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Until 2015, the Penguin I site qualified as an Important Bird Area (Harris et al 2015). Studies of Penguin I fauna were reported by Sladen et al (1968), Croxall and Kirkwood (1979), Jabłoński ( , 1984, Trivelpiece et al (1987), Shuford and Spear (1988), Pereira et al (1990), Naveen et al (2000) Pfeiffer and Peter (2004), Sander et al (2007) and Korczak-Abshire et al (2012). The latest information on the fauna inventory was recorded in 2013 (Harris et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%