2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic structure and genealogy in the Sphagnum subsecundum complex (Sphagnaceae: Bryophyta)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies on bryophytes, widely varying levels of genetic diversities have been observed, e.g. a microsatellite variation range of 0.356-0.744 in six Sphagnum species (Shaw et al, 2008) but only 0.010 in a microsatellite study on Sphagnum wulfianum Girg. on a global scale (Kyrkjeeide et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In previous studies on bryophytes, widely varying levels of genetic diversities have been observed, e.g. a microsatellite variation range of 0.356-0.744 in six Sphagnum species (Shaw et al, 2008) but only 0.010 in a microsatellite study on Sphagnum wulfianum Girg. on a global scale (Kyrkjeeide et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Molecular differences between North American and European moss populations within a species are well known (e.g. Shaw et al 2008;Hedenäs 2012a, b) and suggest that the relationships among North American specimens, and between these and European ones deserve further study for both D. angustifolius and D. turgescens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This molecular data has contributed significantly to the understanding of diversity in terms of the higher taxa or a resolution of older lineages, but not significantly at the species level. To be sure there has been research efforts focused on 'species' groupings or even populations (fide Shaw, 2008aShaw, , 2008b, but this potentially important work, that would define biodiversity using molecular techniques, is not widespread. Molecular phylogenies within revisionary work have been too few to shed much light on the extent or accuracy of current numbers for mosses.…”
Section: Molecular Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%