2016
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic structure among remnant populations of a migratory passerine, the Northern Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe

Abstract: Continuous animal populations often become fragmented due to anthropogenic habitat alterations. These small, fragmented populations are fragile due to demographic and genetic factors, whereas immigration can enhance their long‐term viability. Previously, we showed that high philopatry affected the local dynamics of three small and remnant subpopulations of Northern Wheatears in The Netherlands. Here, we show that these three populations together with an additional larger population in the European lowlands are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible extent of philopatry in wheatears remains unclear. On one hand, adult Cyprus wheatears only rarely change habitats between breeding seasons (Xenophontos & Cresswell, ), and some populations of northern wheatear ( O. oenanthe )—a species belonging to the same clade within Oenanthe (Aliabadian et al., )—are rather philopatric (van Oosten, Mueller, Ottenburghs, Both, & Kempenaers, ). On the other hand, estimates of average breeding and natal dispersal distances of the latter species are only slightly lower than ones of species such as pied flycatcher ( Ficedula hypoleuca ) and barn owl ( Tyto alba ; Paradis, Baillie, Sutherland, & Gregory, ) that display very shallow intraspecific population structures even at continental scales (Burri et al., , ; Lehtonen et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible extent of philopatry in wheatears remains unclear. On one hand, adult Cyprus wheatears only rarely change habitats between breeding seasons (Xenophontos & Cresswell, ), and some populations of northern wheatear ( O. oenanthe )—a species belonging to the same clade within Oenanthe (Aliabadian et al., )—are rather philopatric (van Oosten, Mueller, Ottenburghs, Both, & Kempenaers, ). On the other hand, estimates of average breeding and natal dispersal distances of the latter species are only slightly lower than ones of species such as pied flycatcher ( Ficedula hypoleuca ) and barn owl ( Tyto alba ; Paradis, Baillie, Sutherland, & Gregory, ) that display very shallow intraspecific population structures even at continental scales (Burri et al., , ; Lehtonen et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In The Netherlands, monitoring over six years revealed consistently high hatching failure of eggs in one of the remnant populations situated in a coastal nature reserve where on average 20% of eggs failed to hatch. However, despite the small population size and low population growth, genetic variation (heterozygosity) is still high in this population (Van Oosten et al, 2016), suggesting that inbreeding alone is not likely the main cause of the observed high hatching failure. Although the extent to which heterozygosity, based on markers and as proxy for individual inbreeding coefficients (rather than pedigree-based estimates inbreeding coefficients), is debated (Chapman et al, 2009;Szulkin et al, 2010;Taylor et al, 2010), it seems likely that other factors may be involved in the decreased hatchability of the eggs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The correlation between heterozygosity in certain markers and fitness of an individual is often weak (Chapman et al, 2009;Szulkin et al, 2010). This could mean that fitness of Dutch Northern Wheatears may still be low, despite the relatively high heterozygosity values (Van Oosten et al, 2016). Inbreeding may be suspected because of small contemporary population size and because exchange of colour-ringed individuals between populations is rare (Van Oosten et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both findings suggest that the migration routes and timing of Alpine populations is less the result of an expansion from the ancestral refuge population during the last glacial period, but rather an adaptation to the cooler climate at high elevation. The similarity in timing of migration between populations at high altitude and high latitude is another example of how the local environment might have strong selective power in this species, leading to homologous adaptations which make disentangling the evolutionary relationships between populations all the more challenging (van Oosten et al 2016, Wang et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%