2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic, Structural and Functional Imaging Biomarkers for Early Detection of Conversion from MCI to AD

Abstract: Abstract. With the advent of advanced imaging techniques, genotyping, and methods to assess clinical and biological progression, there is a growing need for a unified framework that could exploit information available from multiple sources to aid diagnosis and the identification of early signs of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We propose a modeling strategy using supervised feature extraction to optimally combine highdimensional imaging modalities with several other low-dimensional disease risk factors. The motivat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature selection is more effective at the registration level between 5mm and 10mm since not only the pathological changes can be detected at this registration level but also the amount of noisy voxels (possible due to remaining inter-subject variability) is still large as shown in Figure 5. (4) In addition, when the classifier is trained on AD vs NC, the classification performance between PMCI and SMCI can be significantly improved, which is in accordance with results presented in previous studies [14], [51], [52]. This finding is encouraging because it is easier to obtain labeled training data from AD and NC subjects than from MCI subjects (MCI subjects need to be tracked for years to establish their training labels while the training labels of AD and NC subjects can be determined at baseline).…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Feature selection is more effective at the registration level between 5mm and 10mm since not only the pathological changes can be detected at this registration level but also the amount of noisy voxels (possible due to remaining inter-subject variability) is still large as shown in Figure 5. (4) In addition, when the classifier is trained on AD vs NC, the classification performance between PMCI and SMCI can be significantly improved, which is in accordance with results presented in previous studies [14], [51], [52]. This finding is encouraging because it is easier to obtain labeled training data from AD and NC subjects than from MCI subjects (MCI subjects need to be tracked for years to establish their training labels while the training labels of AD and NC subjects can be determined at baseline).…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…the two populations [35]. Commonly, in these methods the shape data are modelled on a Riemannian manifold and intrinsic coordinate-free manifold-based methods are used [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, these parameters are fixed to the standard values of α = 0.01, β = 0.01, and γ = 0.001. These fluid parameters have been used in previous studies in Davis et al (2007); Singh et al (2010, 2012) and are known to ensure sufficient smoothness of deformations fields for registration of MRI brain images. The parameter σ that controls the trade-off between the exactness of the match and smoothness regularity term in Equation (3) was also set a priori to the least possible value that ensured successful registration and also resulted in smooth and invertible deformation fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al (2010, 2012) used scalar deformation momenta to build models to explain covariance of shape and clinical data in the form of latent directions extracted in the two spaces but did not develop models summarizing functional relationship between anatomy and clinical variables. These models hence were not directly applicable for the prediction of continuous clinical response.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%