2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-022-01258-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic sex test for the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study verified the sex‐specific RADseq markers identified in Keating et al (2022) to be the most accurate for identifying sex in the short‐beaked echidna with gDNA isolated from blood and hair. In all blood samples, the six male‐specific PCR markers accurately identified gender, as matched to the clinically recorded sex for the corresponding individual, with the exception of one male where no amplification occurred for the CRSPY gene.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study verified the sex‐specific RADseq markers identified in Keating et al (2022) to be the most accurate for identifying sex in the short‐beaked echidna with gDNA isolated from blood and hair. In all blood samples, the six male‐specific PCR markers accurately identified gender, as matched to the clinically recorded sex for the corresponding individual, with the exception of one male where no amplification occurred for the CRSPY gene.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Here, we have followed the recommendation of Keating et al (2022), evaluating a combination of markers to accurately determine sex in the short-beaked echidna. In addition, evaluation of markers has been assessed by investigating marker performance with noninvasive samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations