2024
DOI: 10.1037/adb0001015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic risk for trait aggression and alcohol use predict unique facets of alcohol-related aggression.

Kellyn M. Spychala,
Ellen W. Yeung,
Alex P. Miller
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 74 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MR analyses were conducted using sets of GWAS summary statistics for aggression (n = 87,485; Ip et al, 2021), alcohol consumption (n = 403,931; obtained from direct-to-consumer genetics company 23andMe, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA and described in Liu et al, 2019), AUD (n = 514,944), ADHD (n= 225,534; Demontis et al, 2023), and EF (n = 427,037; Hatoum et al, 2023). For the AUD summary statistics, a metanalysis of separate summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (Walters et al, 2018), Million Veterans Program (Zhou et al, 2020), and FinnGen (FinnGen, 2021) was conducted (Spychala et al, 2024). These GWAS summary statistics were chosen in order to avoid sample overlap, which can bias MR analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR analyses were conducted using sets of GWAS summary statistics for aggression (n = 87,485; Ip et al, 2021), alcohol consumption (n = 403,931; obtained from direct-to-consumer genetics company 23andMe, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA and described in Liu et al, 2019), AUD (n = 514,944), ADHD (n= 225,534; Demontis et al, 2023), and EF (n = 427,037; Hatoum et al, 2023). For the AUD summary statistics, a metanalysis of separate summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (Walters et al, 2018), Million Veterans Program (Zhou et al, 2020), and FinnGen (FinnGen, 2021) was conducted (Spychala et al, 2024). These GWAS summary statistics were chosen in order to avoid sample overlap, which can bias MR analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%