2015
DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic risk assessment for breast and gynecological malignancies

Abstract: Cancer genetic risk assessment is complex, and models developed to estimate risk may not apply to all populations. Identifying genetic factors related to cancer risk is also becoming increasingly complex with the clinical implementation of panel testing. This testing approach should be critically evaluated by healthcare providers. Further research is needed to create evidence-based guidelines for panel testing and management recommendations for moderately penetrant genes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Australian guidelines recommend BRCA gene testing for breast cancer patients with a mutation risk of ⩾10 per cent, as calculated by BRCA probability models or based on breast cancer characteristics, with approximately 25 per cent leakage expected (eviQ, 2017). In this patient cohort, evidence-based guidelines were effective in identifying high risk individuals, however, the 33.33 per cent leakage is not ideal (Profato and Arun, 2015). When applying the more inclusive, updated guidelines, the leakage rate was reduced to 8.33 per cent, confirming the updated guidelines are indeed more effective in identifying BRCA mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian guidelines recommend BRCA gene testing for breast cancer patients with a mutation risk of ⩾10 per cent, as calculated by BRCA probability models or based on breast cancer characteristics, with approximately 25 per cent leakage expected (eviQ, 2017). In this patient cohort, evidence-based guidelines were effective in identifying high risk individuals, however, the 33.33 per cent leakage is not ideal (Profato and Arun, 2015). When applying the more inclusive, updated guidelines, the leakage rate was reduced to 8.33 per cent, confirming the updated guidelines are indeed more effective in identifying BRCA mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salvatore et al also noted a significant improvement in the quality of life and sexual activity when laser therapy was used in women with VVA. 51 …”
Section: Laser Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, clinical preventive-prophylactic strategies have been proposed (www.nccn.org) for subjects carrying pathogenic mutations in these genes thus making urgent the individualization of appropriate criteria to candidate woman to BRCA1/2 genetic test [3]. The problem of best criteria for genetic counseling enrollment was debated since the last decade generally concluding that presence of familiarity and high risk for BRCA mutation probability calculated by specific softwares [4] should be utilized in routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%