The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332016v16n1a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic resistance of maize inbred lines to anthracnose leaf blight

Abstract: -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of frequency distribution confirmed the phenotypic contrast for resistance to ALB between the lines L R 04-2 and L S 95-1, regardless of the experimental year (Prochno et al 2016). The frequency distribution for AUDPC presented a normal distribution by Shapiro-Wilk test at 5% of probability.…”
Section: Resistance Of Progenies To Anthracnose Leaf Blightsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis of frequency distribution confirmed the phenotypic contrast for resistance to ALB between the lines L R 04-2 and L S 95-1, regardless of the experimental year (Prochno et al 2016). The frequency distribution for AUDPC presented a normal distribution by Shapiro-Wilk test at 5% of probability.…”
Section: Resistance Of Progenies To Anthracnose Leaf Blightsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Inbred lines of tropical maize, belonging to the C. graminicola resistance breeding program of State University of Ponta Grossa, originated from south of Brazil maize landraces, were initially screened for stalk rot and ALB (Prochno et al 2016). The ALB contrasting inbred lines L R 04-2 (resistant) and L S 95-1 (susceptible) were crossed to obtain the segregating population of F 2 generation.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It occurs because these pathogenic organisms reduce photosynthetic area and, consequently, synthesis and translocation of assimilates (GOMES et al, 2011). In many cases, the damages are considered as indirect because the reduction in leaf area predisposes the plants to stem and ear rot pathogens (PROCHNO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic resistance is effective to control maize leaf diseases (PROCHNO et al, 2016); therefore, genetic breeding programs seek to develop inbred lines and hybrids with higher resistance levels (SILVEIRA et al, 2006). Several studies in the literature point to a genetic variability for resistance to leaf diseases in some maize cultivars (NIHEI;FERREIRA, 2012;VIEIRA et al, 2012), but a few of them approach the genetic resistance of inbred lines (SILVEIRA et al, 2006;VIVEK et al, 2010;SAITO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%