2008
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2008.70509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Relationship of Gestation Length with Birth and Weaning Weight in Hanwoo (Bos Taurus Coreanae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table.2) Means for BW, WW and DG were 28.6, 92.6 and 0.60 kg., respectively. Mean of BW lower than those reported by Hullya Atil et al, (2005) (31.8 kg) and higher than Hwang et al (2008) (24.4 kg).while Mean of WW higher than While, Hwang et al, (2008) The coefficient of variation for BW, WW and DG were 11.1, 12.1 and 17.5 % respectively. Hullya Atil et al (2005) estimates for BW and WW were 14.4 and 10.5 Hwang et al, (2008) found that BW and WW were 15.3 and 22.0.…”
Section: Environmental Trend (Env)mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Table.2) Means for BW, WW and DG were 28.6, 92.6 and 0.60 kg., respectively. Mean of BW lower than those reported by Hullya Atil et al, (2005) (31.8 kg) and higher than Hwang et al (2008) (24.4 kg).while Mean of WW higher than While, Hwang et al, (2008) The coefficient of variation for BW, WW and DG were 11.1, 12.1 and 17.5 % respectively. Hullya Atil et al (2005) estimates for BW and WW were 14.4 and 10.5 Hwang et al, (2008) found that BW and WW were 15.3 and 22.0.…”
Section: Environmental Trend (Env)mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Mean of BW lower than those reported by Hullya Atil et al, (2005) (31.8 kg) and higher than Hwang et al (2008) (24.4 kg).while Mean of WW higher than While, Hwang et al, (2008) The coefficient of variation for BW, WW and DG were 11.1, 12.1 and 17.5 % respectively. Hullya Atil et al (2005) estimates for BW and WW were 14.4 and 10.5 Hwang et al, (2008) found that BW and WW were 15.3 and 22.0. Differences between the results of this study and the results of previous research may be due to differences in the methods of statistical analysis or the number of records used or due to different management and ways of care.…”
Section: Environmental Trend (Env)mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few literatures estimated the heritability for GP in goat breed. However, several literatures reported the higher estimates for this trait in other species by use of different models, such as the Yankasa sheep (0.20) by paternal half-sib model (Osinowo et al, 1993), the horse (0.2) by linear unbiased predictor univariate animal model, the Hanwoo cattle (0.38-0.48) obtained in different models by REML (Hwang et al, 2008), the Japanese Black cattle (0.53) by bi-variate analysis (Ibi et al, 2008) and the Danish Holsteins (0.42) obtained in a threshold model by Bayesian Gibbs sampling (Hansen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Heritabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The gestation period (GP) has a large distinction between single and multiple birth species and affects the total maternal production. However, few literatures have reported to estimate genetic parameters for LSW and GP in the goat, although there are several literatures that have estimated the genetic parameters for LSB in the goat (Menendez- Buxadera et al, 2003;Bagnicka et al, 2007) and the sheep (Hanford et al, 2006;Afolayan et al, 2008), for LSW in the sheep (van Wyk et al, 2003;Hanford et al, 2006), for GP in the sheep (Osinowo et al, 1993) and the cattle (Hwang et al, 2008;Ibi et al, 2008). Moreover, litter size (LS) significantly associates with the growth of kids.…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 97%