2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20593-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relatedness reveals total population size of white sharks in eastern Australia and New Zealand

Abstract: Conservation concerns exist for many sharks but robust estimates of abundance are often lacking. Improving population status is a performance measure for species under conservation or recovery plans, yet the lack of data permitting estimation of population size means the efficacy of management actions can be difficult to assess, and achieving the goal of removing species from conservation listing challenging. For potentially dangerous species, like the white shark, balancing conservation and public safety dema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
172
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(32 reference statements)
5
172
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter limitation may be overcome to some extent with the use of a hypervariable region in the mitochondrial genome and/or sex-linked markers. It should be noted that genetic differentiation between maternal and paternal relatives is a general problem with pedigree reconstruction (Huisman, 2017;Hillary et al, 2018). Therefore, incorporating the uncertainty of differentiation or modifying the theory with the use of HS (not MHS) remains a task for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter limitation may be overcome to some extent with the use of a hypervariable region in the mitochondrial genome and/or sex-linked markers. It should be noted that genetic differentiation between maternal and paternal relatives is a general problem with pedigree reconstruction (Huisman, 2017;Hillary et al, 2018). Therefore, incorporating the uncertainty of differentiation or modifying the theory with the use of HS (not MHS) remains a task for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a more accurate estimation of contemporary effective population size can be obtained by, for example, more accurately assigned kinships (Wang et al, 2016). In addition, the recently developed theory of estimation of absolute adult number, which is based on sampled kinship pairs and known as the close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) method (Bravington et al, 2016a,b;Skaug, 2017;Hillary et al, 2018), makes it possible to use a full-sibling (FS) or half-sibling (HS) pair; this involves many more DNA markers for detection than a parent-offspring pair. It should be noted that the CKMR method is designed to minimize the effect of reproductive variance originating from unmodeled covariates, such as avoiding the use of sibling pairs sampled from the same cohorts; meanwhile, reproductive variance strongly affects the estimation of contemporary effective population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed here provides information pertaining to both the number of mothers and the effect of overdispersed reproduction from the number of within-cohort MHS pairs. A previous study of the HSP-based CKMR method avoided using within-cohort HSPs, as these may lead to a biased estimation due to the effect of within-age variation (Bravington et al 2016b;CCSBT 2017;Hillary et al 2018). Our method overcame this limitation by directly incorporating this effect into the probability that two offspring pairs share an MHS relationship (π).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) is a recently developed method that uses information about relatedness in a sample, made possible by recent advances in genetic methods for kinship determination (Bravington et al 2016a,b;Skaug 2017;Hillary et al 2018), although similar ideas have been proposed in the beginning of the 21st century (Nielsen et al 2001;Pearse et al 2001;Skaug 2001). The rationale is that the presence of a kinship pair in the sample is analogous to the recapture of a marked individual in MR. Kinship pairs in the sample are less likely to be found in larger populations; thus, the number of kinship pairs may reflect adult abundance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) is a recently developed method for estimating N that utilizes the information about kinship in a sample. This was possible owing to the recent advances in genetic methods for kinship determination (Bravington, Grewe, & Davies, 2016;Bravington, Skaug, & Anderson, 2016;Hillary et al, 2018;Skaug, 2017) although similar methods have been proposed in the beginning of the 21st century (Nielsen, Mattila, Clapham, & Palsbøll, 2001;Pearse, Eckerman, Janzen, & Avise, 2001;Skaug, 2001). Besides, the rationale is that the presence of a kinship pair in the sample is analogous to the recapture of a marked individual in mark-recapture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%