2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic redundancy and persistence of plasmid-mediated trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistant effluent and stream water Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas, the relative abundance of sul2 was negatively correlated with SDZ and SM1 (Figure 6E), Huang et al (2017) indicated that sul 2 was significant correlated to intI 1 in water and sediment samples, which meant that sul 2 gene were associated with the mobile genetic elements (Cheng et al, 2013). Researchers also found that sul2 and sul3 located on plasmids are transferable and stable even in the absence of antibiotics (Suhartono et al, 2016). Thus, this negative correlation between sul2 and residue of sulfonamides might be attributed to mobility of sul2 located on mobile genetic elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the relative abundance of sul2 was negatively correlated with SDZ and SM1 (Figure 6E), Huang et al (2017) indicated that sul 2 was significant correlated to intI 1 in water and sediment samples, which meant that sul 2 gene were associated with the mobile genetic elements (Cheng et al, 2013). Researchers also found that sul2 and sul3 located on plasmids are transferable and stable even in the absence of antibiotics (Suhartono et al, 2016). Thus, this negative correlation between sul2 and residue of sulfonamides might be attributed to mobility of sul2 located on mobile genetic elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genes sul2, sul3, tet(A) and vanA were not detected in any water samples across the three communities. This is despite them being commonly detected in various environments (Suhartono, Savin and Gbur 2016;Young et al 2016;Zhang, Lin and Yu 2016). Three genes, ampC, mecA and sul1 were detected in a few water samples (Fig.…”
Section: Detection Of Argsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sulfonamides are one of the earliest antibiotics introduced in the world and widely used for treating human infections (van Hoek et al 2011;Roberts, Schwarz and Aarts 2012). These genes had been commonly detected in various environments such as drinking water, surface water and wastewater (Schwartz et al 2003;Alexander et al 2015;Suhartono, Savin and Gbur 2016). However, even though only a fraction of the samples tested via qPCR were positive for the ARGs, the numbers detected are alarmingly high.…”
Section: Detection Of Argsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Despite the fact that antibiotics do not significantly influence conjugation within bacteria, 29 antibiotics, at the subinhibitory level, may play an important role in the survival and persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in the aquatic environment. 17 In terms of sulfamethoxazole resistance, the number of sul genes in plasmids within an isolate had a statistically significant effect on the transfer frequencies of plasmids based on the ratio of T/D ( genes was intermediate, and not different from, those conferring one or 3 sul genes. Based on the T/R ratio, however, sul gene combination had no significant effects on the transfer frequency ( Fig.…”
Section: ¡5mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…15,16 A subset of isolates expressing resistance to sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were found to possess redundancy and a diversity among sulfamethoxazole resistance (sul) or trimethoprim resistance (dfr) genes, respectively. 17 These sul and dfr and other antibiotic resistance genes might be associated with conjugative and/or mobilizable plasmids and integrons, which were also found to be abundant among resistant isolates, 18 promoting dissemination of the antibiotic resistance determinants. Hence, the objective of the research was to determine the differences among sampling site of origin, intI presence, phenotypic resistance to number of different antibiotics, and number of sulfamethoxazole resistance (sul) or trimethoprim resistance (dfr) genes with respect to transfer frequencies measured among isolates.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%