1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5266(98)80013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic recombination in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long repeats including LINE-1 elements are normally heavily DNA-methylated (Woodcock et al, 1988;Crowther et al, 1991;Woodcock et al, 1997), a feature of heterochromatin. DNA methylation (and heterochromatin in general) has been reported to suppress homologous recombination (P脿ldi et al, 1995;Maloisel and Rossignol, 1998;Schnable et al, 1998;Fu et al, 2002;Yao et al, 2002;Yamada et al, 2004;Myers et al, 2005) as well as transposition (Yoder et al, 1997;Walsh et al, 1998;Hirochika et al, 2000;Robertson, 2001;Bird, 2002;Kato et al, 2003). Accordingly, reports of deletions caused by homologous recombination between LINE-1 elements are rare (Segal et al, 1999) except in cancers (Florl and Schulz, 2003) where LINE-1 elements are frequently hypomethylated (Santourlidis et al, 1999;Takai et al, 2000;Ehrlich, 2002;Carnell and Goodman, 2003;Florl et al, 2004;Roman-Gomez et al, 2005).…”
Section: Non-random Repeat Distributions Via Natural Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long repeats including LINE-1 elements are normally heavily DNA-methylated (Woodcock et al, 1988;Crowther et al, 1991;Woodcock et al, 1997), a feature of heterochromatin. DNA methylation (and heterochromatin in general) has been reported to suppress homologous recombination (P脿ldi et al, 1995;Maloisel and Rossignol, 1998;Schnable et al, 1998;Fu et al, 2002;Yao et al, 2002;Yamada et al, 2004;Myers et al, 2005) as well as transposition (Yoder et al, 1997;Walsh et al, 1998;Hirochika et al, 2000;Robertson, 2001;Bird, 2002;Kato et al, 2003). Accordingly, reports of deletions caused by homologous recombination between LINE-1 elements are rare (Segal et al, 1999) except in cancers (Florl and Schulz, 2003) where LINE-1 elements are frequently hypomethylated (Santourlidis et al, 1999;Takai et al, 2000;Ehrlich, 2002;Carnell and Goodman, 2003;Florl et al, 2004;Roman-Gomez et al, 2005).…”
Section: Non-random Repeat Distributions Via Natural Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the double strand break repair (DSBR) model , meiotic recombination initiates with a double strand break (DSB). Fungal, animal and plant chromosomes exhibit regions of recombination hyperactivity, i.e., hot spots, and hypoactivity, i.e., cold spots (reviewed in NACHMAN 2002;PETES 2001;SCHNABLE et al 1998). Consistent with the DSBR model, recombination hot spots in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are clearly associated with DSBs (reviewed in LIGHTEN and GOLDMAN 1995) and these DSB hot spots are not distributed randomly across the yeast genome .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recombination hot spots in yeast, as evidenced by high frequencies of DSBs, are not distributed randomly across the genome . In most organisms studied, recombination is suppressed near centromeres and, with the exception of C. elegans (BARNES et al 1995), rates of recombination are often positively correlated with gene density (reviewed in LIGHTEN and GOLDMAN 1995;SCHNABLE et al 1998). Recombination events cluster in gene-rich regions in the grasses (Fu et al 2001;GILL et al 1996a;GILL et al 1996b;KUNZEL et al 2000) suggesting that genes are recombination hot spots.…”
Section: Meiotic Recombination Events Resolve Non-randomly Within Genmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations