2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic profiling from challenging samples: Direct PCR of touch DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples and substrates used in this study did not reflect all possible scenarios of contact DNA left behind in forensic investigations (e.g., damaged, degraded, and intact cellular DNA). We have previously reported that the direct PCR method can be used to generate full DNA profiles from fingermarks deposited 2 h after individuals washed their hands (15). The direct PCR approach in this study led to significantly higher peak heights of alleles (p = 0.001) compared to the extraction experiment when controlling for DNA mass and substrate (See Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples and substrates used in this study did not reflect all possible scenarios of contact DNA left behind in forensic investigations (e.g., damaged, degraded, and intact cellular DNA). We have previously reported that the direct PCR method can be used to generate full DNA profiles from fingermarks deposited 2 h after individuals washed their hands (15). The direct PCR approach in this study led to significantly higher peak heights of alleles (p = 0.001) compared to the extraction experiment when controlling for DNA mass and substrate (See Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, in light of recent advances, new swab types and new swab media can now be considered as alternative methods for DNA recovery. Novel DNA capture methods in conjunction with direct PCR can be used to explore the potential for improvement in information obtained from forensic samples .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method is rapid (23) because there is no need for a DNA extraction step, and there is a reduction in associated costs because there is no need to purchase DNA extraction kits. Most importantly for forensic science laboratories, by eliminating the need to increase PCR cycle number or concentrate the amplified products, the procedure is easily adapted into working practices, allowing laboratories accredited to ISO17025 to use the method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If DNA exists as a free molecule, then it should bind readily to positively charged fibers (23). Furthermore, the use of a surfactant such as Triton-X is thought to assist in the binding of DNA to a swab (24) and hence, these two features were used to capture DNA from touched substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, swabs or other materials can be used to remove touch DNA from a substrate and then the swab head can be introduced directly into the PCR reaction. The successful use of direct amplification for touch DNA recovery has been widely reported from a range of sample types [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%