2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic polymorphism of 22 autosomal STR markers in a Han population of Southern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, 22 autosomal STR loci, including 18 non-CODIS loci and four CODIS loci, were utilized to assess their genetic distributions in the Kazakh group living in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Significant deviations of LD among these 22 STR loci were detected in D10S1435-D15S659 and D13S325-D17S1290, which were not found in other similar studies based on Microreader™ 23sp ID kit (Fang et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2016). Moreover, the fairly small r 2 values of 22 STR pairs were conductive to determine the low correlations between these pairwise STRs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In our study, 22 autosomal STR loci, including 18 non-CODIS loci and four CODIS loci, were utilized to assess their genetic distributions in the Kazakh group living in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Significant deviations of LD among these 22 STR loci were detected in D10S1435-D15S659 and D13S325-D17S1290, which were not found in other similar studies based on Microreader™ 23sp ID kit (Fang et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2016). Moreover, the fairly small r 2 values of 22 STR pairs were conductive to determine the low correlations between these pairwise STRs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…We assessed the differences between Xinjiang Mongolian population and six reference populations in the allele frequencies of these 22 loci by using the analysis of molecular variance (Table 2). There were significant differences at 6, 8, 6, 8, 9, and 17 loci between Mongolian population and Northern Han (Hebei, Henan, Shaanxi) (2), Guangdong Han (3), Chengdu Han (4), Xinjiang Hui (6), Xinjiang Uygur (7), and Hainan Li (5) populations, respectively. In addition, we chose 16 loci as overlapping loci (except for D2S1338, D9S925, D12S391, D16S539, D20S470, and D21S1270) to compare the studied population with the Qinghai Tibetan (26) and Hainan Han (27) populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This panel was validated by a previous study (1), which assessed its sensitivity, accuracy, precision, stability, stutter percentage, peak height ratio, and species specificity. It was used to analyze allelic distribution in Northern Han (2), Southern Han (3), Chengdu Han (4), Hainan Li (5), Xinjiang Hui (6), and Xinjiang Uygur (7). In addition, detailed sequence information of these 22 loci was studied by Phillips et al (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, Han in Eastern China at 21 STR loci [5], Tibetan at 21 STR loci [6], Han in Northern China at 18 STR loci [7], Uygur at 18 STR loci [8,9], Han in Western China at 17 STR loci [10,11], Han in Southern China at 17 STR loci [12,13], Han in Central China at 9 STR loci [14,15], Han in Southwest China at 7 STR loci [16], and Mongolian at 6 STR loci [17,18] differentiation of individuals and parentage testing. Additionally, the data of current investigation will also be beneficial for the development of a database of the Chinese Han population.…”
Section: Genetic Distribution Of 21 Str Loci In the Chinesementioning
confidence: 99%