Abstract:The processes of yeast selection for using as wine fermentation starters have revealed a great phenotypic diversity both at interspecific and intraspecific level, which is explained by a corresponding genetic variation among different yeast isolates. Thus, the mechanisms involved in promoting these genetic changes are the main engine generating yeast biodiversity. Currently, an important task to understand biodiversity, population structure and evolutionary history of wine yeasts is the study of the molecular … Show more
“…3.1. Differentiation of non-Saccharomyces strains by random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) Molecular techniques have been successfully applied by several authors to identify the yeast biodiversity in diverse environments, not only for species identification, but also for strains identification (Andrighetto, Psomas, Tzanetakis, Suzzi, & Lombardi, 2000;Grando, Ubeda, & Briones, 1994;Guillamón & Barrio, 2017;Suzzi et al, 2000;Úbeda, Maldonado Gil, Chiva, Guillamón, & Briones, 2014), due to the fact that probiotic activity it is associated to strain-level.…”
Due to healthcare is increasing in nowadays, the use of the commercial probiotics is in progress and each day they are more demanded. The challenge of this study is to identify yeast species for using as probiotic organisms. Thus, the research applied a step-by-step approach, to study the probiotic potential of non-Saccharomyces yeast strains. The 215 yeasts were isolated from different environments such as wineries, oil mills, brines cheeses, fermented vegetables and distilleries in previous works and were identified to strain level by RAPD-PCR technique resulting 108 different strains. A general screening was carried out to know the probiotic capability of the yeasts, following the next steps: study of the ability to resist and grow of the yeasts when they exposed to simulated in vitro digestion conditions and influence of time, temperature, pH and the presence of enzymes on the kinetic growth parameters (lag phase (λ), generation time (G), maximum OD (OD) and the specific growth rate constant (μ)). The results made possible the selection of the 23% of the strains and they were assayed for knowing their capability of self-aggregation and hydrophobicity. Biofilm formation capacity and viability after simulated sequential salivary-gastric-intestinal digestion were then studied for the 10 best strains. Statistical analyses were applied in each step to make the selection. The final results showed that two yeasts, H. osmophila and P. kudriavzevii, were the most promising strains.
“…3.1. Differentiation of non-Saccharomyces strains by random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) Molecular techniques have been successfully applied by several authors to identify the yeast biodiversity in diverse environments, not only for species identification, but also for strains identification (Andrighetto, Psomas, Tzanetakis, Suzzi, & Lombardi, 2000;Grando, Ubeda, & Briones, 1994;Guillamón & Barrio, 2017;Suzzi et al, 2000;Úbeda, Maldonado Gil, Chiva, Guillamón, & Briones, 2014), due to the fact that probiotic activity it is associated to strain-level.…”
Due to healthcare is increasing in nowadays, the use of the commercial probiotics is in progress and each day they are more demanded. The challenge of this study is to identify yeast species for using as probiotic organisms. Thus, the research applied a step-by-step approach, to study the probiotic potential of non-Saccharomyces yeast strains. The 215 yeasts were isolated from different environments such as wineries, oil mills, brines cheeses, fermented vegetables and distilleries in previous works and were identified to strain level by RAPD-PCR technique resulting 108 different strains. A general screening was carried out to know the probiotic capability of the yeasts, following the next steps: study of the ability to resist and grow of the yeasts when they exposed to simulated in vitro digestion conditions and influence of time, temperature, pH and the presence of enzymes on the kinetic growth parameters (lag phase (λ), generation time (G), maximum OD (OD) and the specific growth rate constant (μ)). The results made possible the selection of the 23% of the strains and they were assayed for knowing their capability of self-aggregation and hydrophobicity. Biofilm formation capacity and viability after simulated sequential salivary-gastric-intestinal digestion were then studied for the 10 best strains. Statistical analyses were applied in each step to make the selection. The final results showed that two yeasts, H. osmophila and P. kudriavzevii, were the most promising strains.
“…The stresses that yeast cells encounter during wine fermentations include the elevated content of sugar in grape musts, the high ethanol concentrations achieved, the temperature of the different fermentation types, and the sulfite added as an antimicrobial and antioxidant agent (Bauer and Pretorius, 2000;Divol et al, 2012). These environmental stresses exerted for hundreds of years and thousands of generations have caused wine yeasts to evolve rapidly, shaping their genome through different genetic mechanisms (Marsit and Dequin, 2015;Guillamón and Barrio, 2017;Legras et al, 2018).…”
Summary
Sulfite‐generating compounds are widely used during winemaking as preservatives because of its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Thus, wine yeast strains have developed different genetic strategies to increase its sulfite resistance. The most efficient sulfite detoxification mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae uses a plasma membrane protein called Ssu1 to efflux sulfite. In wine yeast strains, two chromosomal translocations (VIIItXVI and XVtXVI) involving the SSU1 promoter region have been shown to upregulate SSU1 expression and, as a result, increase sulfite tolerance. In this study, we have identified a novel chromosomal rearrangement that triggers wine yeast sulfite adaptation. An inversion in chromosome XVI (inv‐XVI) probably due to sequence microhomology, which involves SSU1 and GCR1 regulatory regions, increases the expression of SSU1 and the sulfite resistance of a commercial wine yeast strain. A detailed dissection of this chimeric SSU1 promoter indicates that both the removed SSU1 promoter sequence and the relocated GCR1 sequence contribute to SSU1 upregulation and sulfite tolerance. However, no relevant function has been attributed to the SSU1‐promoter‐binding transcription factor Fzf1. These results unveil a new genomic event that confers an evolutive advantage to wine yeast strains.
“…While industrial Saccharomyces hybrids inherit good fermentation performance such as growth ability at lower temperatures [69][70][71][72][73], hybridization gives rise to instability of the chromosomes, which in turn results in spore unviability [74,75]. It has been also reported that sporulation efficiency is significantly anticorrelated with the fraction of the genome associated with large (>20 kb) amplifications and deletions [76]. Aneuploidies and massive copy number variations are also seen in inter-strain hybrids of S. cerevisiae.…”
Section: Difficulty and Contradiction In Conventional Crossbreedingmentioning
Sexual reproduction is almost a universal feature of eukaryotic organisms, which allows the reproduction of new organisms by combining the genetic information from two individuals of different sexes. Based on the mechanism of sexual reproduction, crossbreeding provides an attractive opportunity to improve the traits of animals, plants, and fungi. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been widely utilized in fermentative production since ancient times. Currently it is still used for many essential biotechnological processes including the production of beer, wine, and biofuels. It is surprising that many yeast strains used in the industry exhibit low rates of sporulation resulting in limited crossbreeding efficiency. Here, I provide an overview of the recent findings about infertility challenges of yeasts domesticated for fermentation along with the progress in crossbreeding technologies. The aim of this review is to create an opportunity for future crossbreeding of yeasts used for fermentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.