2011
DOI: 10.17221/1286-cjas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters for somatic cell score in the first three lactations of Czech Holstein and Fleckvieh breeds using a random regression model

Abstract: ABSTRACT:A multiple-lactation random regression model was applied to test-day somatic cell score (SCS) records from the first three lactations of Czech Holstein and Fleckvieh cows. For Holstein, the data included 26 314 cows, with 244 953, 76 188 and 26 153 test-day records in the first, second and third lactation, respectively. For Fleckvieh, the data included 24 061 cows, with 223 421, 93 358 and 31 305 test-day records in the first, second and third lactation, respectively. The linear model for SCS included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides additive genetic effect, our model contained in its random part the common flock environment effect and two permanent environment effects. Other studies treat the common flock environment effect mainly in the fixed part of the model, while only the permanent environment effect over lactations and additive genetic effect were fitted random (Ligda et al, 2000;Kominakis et al, 2001;Horstick et al, 2002;Cadavez et al, 2011;Zavadilová et al, 2011). The permanent environment effect within lactation partly refers to the animal, thus, the heritability estimates in our study could be lower than in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides additive genetic effect, our model contained in its random part the common flock environment effect and two permanent environment effects. Other studies treat the common flock environment effect mainly in the fixed part of the model, while only the permanent environment effect over lactations and additive genetic effect were fitted random (Ligda et al, 2000;Kominakis et al, 2001;Horstick et al, 2002;Cadavez et al, 2011;Zavadilová et al, 2011). The permanent environment effect within lactation partly refers to the animal, thus, the heritability estimates in our study could be lower than in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Schaeffer and Deckers (1994) were the first researchers who proposed random regression model to model test-day records of milk traits in dairy cattle. Soon afterwards, similar analyses were done in dairy cattle by Jamrozik and Schaeffer (1997), Van der Werf et al (1998), Olori et al (1999), Kettunen et al (2000), Cobuci et al (2005Cobuci et al ( , 2011, Druet et al (2005), Zavadilová et al (2011), and many others. Random regression model was also used for the genetic parameter estimation of milk traits in dairy sheep by Ligda et al (2000), Kominakis et al (2001), Horstick et al (2002), Banos et al (2005), Cadavez et al (2011), and even in dairy goats (Breda et al, 2006;Menéndez-Buxadera et al, 2010;Menezes et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More correlated traits must be brought into calculation of the CBVs in cases of low correlation between the missing trait and other traits. Zavadilová et al (2011) stated the importance of sufficiently high correlation between selected BVs when considering to estimate the BV for a trait that is itself difficult to measure for selection purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCC is frequently used to consider the quality payments to dairy producers. It is the main reason why the SCC is daily checked by farmers during milking and secondly this trait is included in the breeding goals and selection schemes of many dairy cattle breeds (Zavadilová et al, 2011).…”
Section: Base Principles Applied In the Bio-economic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%