2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters for economically important traits in yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the traits studied, genetic correlations (0.921-0.969) were higher than phenotypic correlations (0.711-0.748). There are signifi cant genetic correlations among studied traits, which accord with other studies estimating signifi cant positive and high genetic correlations between growth traits (Hung et al, 2013;Trọng et al, 2013;Whatmore et al, 2013).…”
Section: Heritability and Correlationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the traits studied, genetic correlations (0.921-0.969) were higher than phenotypic correlations (0.711-0.748). There are signifi cant genetic correlations among studied traits, which accord with other studies estimating signifi cant positive and high genetic correlations between growth traits (Hung et al, 2013;Trọng et al, 2013;Whatmore et al, 2013).…”
Section: Heritability and Correlationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The correlation coeffi cients of estimated breeding values and phenotypic values of the studied traits ranged from 0.506 to 0.524, which were lower than those reported by Zhang et al (2011) on body mass of shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis (0.732-0.907). This was mainly because of the small number of testing families (only 22 families), unsatisfactory data structure (just full-sib families) and insuffi cient depth of the pedigree (only single generation), as reported by Whatmore et al (2013), and the low trait heritabilities obtained in this study. Therefore, for estimating genetic parameters accurately, it is essential to include a good depth in the pedigree and ideal data structure in the experimental design.…”
Section: Heritability and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The heritability estimates in the present study ranged from 0.12 to 0.37 which is comparable to those reported by Navarro et al (2009). Whatmore et al (2013) for body and carcass traits in Seriola lalandi (0.15 to 0.30). Gjerde et al (2012) estimated the heritability of body weight in Oreochromis niloticus (0.19±0.04), which was higher than thepresent estimate at 720 days of age (0.12) but lower than those for the other three ages (0.22 -0.37) obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Heritability Estimationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Tagged individuals from the families are now undergoing growth performance analysis as the initial phase of their evaluation and eventual selection as broodstock. The prospects for genetic selection are good and a moderate to high heritability for growth is expected based on the results for Australian kingfish (Whatmore et al 2013). …”
Section: Kingfishmentioning
confidence: 97%