2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9809-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters and trends for calving interval in the first three lactations of Iranian Holsteins

Abstract: Calving records from the Animal Breeding Center of Iran collected from January 1987 to December 2007 and comprising 292,875 calving events of Holsteins from 1,413 dairy herds were analyzed using univariate and bivariate linear animal models to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations for calving intervals in the first three lactations of Holstein cows. Genetic trends were obtained by regressing yearly mean estimates of breeding values on calving year. Average calving intervals were from 406 to 414 days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated additive, permanent environmental effect, and residual variances in multiparous cows were 198.3 (67.8), 71.4 (100.4), and 2953.7 (103.15), respectively. The heritability estimates for the length of the CI in primi-and multiparous cows were 0.05 (0.01) and 0.06 (0.01), respectively, which are consistent with findings from other studies on dairy cattle [17,[30][31][32][33]. Generally, the large unexplained residual variation observed for the length of the CI is attributable not only to the large effect of the environmental factors on this trait but also to the low quality of the data [34].…”
Section: Variance Components and Accuracy Of Genomic Predictionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The estimated additive, permanent environmental effect, and residual variances in multiparous cows were 198.3 (67.8), 71.4 (100.4), and 2953.7 (103.15), respectively. The heritability estimates for the length of the CI in primi-and multiparous cows were 0.05 (0.01) and 0.06 (0.01), respectively, which are consistent with findings from other studies on dairy cattle [17,[30][31][32][33]. Generally, the large unexplained residual variation observed for the length of the CI is attributable not only to the large effect of the environmental factors on this trait but also to the low quality of the data [34].…”
Section: Variance Components and Accuracy Of Genomic Predictionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Medium to high heritability estimates for A and B parameters imply that much of the improvement on these parameters could be attained by genetic selection. The low estimate of heritability for K implies that much of the improvement on this growth curve parameter could be obtained by improving associated environmental conditions rather than genetic selection [ 17 , 18 ]. It is important to note that the variation range of HPDs of the direct heritabilities is located at the region greater than zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Interbull guidelines (Interbull, 2001) stated that an animal model is better than a sire model and a multiple-trait model is better than a single-trait model. Genetic parameters have been estimated for dystocia (Abdullahpour et al, 2006;Eghbalsaied et al, 2012), productive (Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, 2011) and reproductive traits (Toghiani-Pozveh, 2009;Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh and Ardalan, 2010;Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, 2011;Ghiasi et al, 2011) in Iranian Holstein cows. Nevertheless, the estimates of genetic correlations between dystocia and performance traits were scarce in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%