2020
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters and direct and maternal effects for important traits in late‐feathering Qingyuan partridge hens in China

Abstract: Qingyuan partridge chicken is an important indigenous chicken in China. In its breeding schemes, chickens are usually selected at the age of 105‐day‐old for five traits, including body weight (BW), shank length (SL), shank girth (SG), comb height (CH) and feather maturity (FM). At present, genetic parameters of the aforementioned traits have still not been studied in Qingyuan partridge chickens. The objectives of this study were the following: (1) to investigate whether the optimal statistical models of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the multi‐trait models, we estimated the direct heritability and total heritability. Estimates of direct heritabilities based on the model including only direct additive genetic effects (Table 2) were higher than those based on the model also including maternal additive genetic effects (Table 3), which was consistent with the findings of our previous study (Kang et al, 2020). Because the maternal additive effects were significant for all five traits, it is better to include them in models for analysing these traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the multi‐trait models, we estimated the direct heritability and total heritability. Estimates of direct heritabilities based on the model including only direct additive genetic effects (Table 2) were higher than those based on the model also including maternal additive genetic effects (Table 3), which was consistent with the findings of our previous study (Kang et al, 2020). Because the maternal additive effects were significant for all five traits, it is better to include them in models for analysing these traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, we also used a model, model 2, that included both direct additive genetic effects and maternal additive genetic effects. Because we previously found that the optimal model for BW included maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects in addition to the direct additive genetic effect (Kang et al, 2020), we tested a third model, model 3, that additionally included the permanent environmental effect for BW. The specific models were as follows:boldygoodbreak=μbold1goodbreak+boldXbgoodbreak+Zaboldagoodbreak+bolde,boldygoodbreak=μbold1goodbreak+boldXbgoodbreak+Zaboldagoodbreak+Zmboldmgoodbreak+bolde,boldygoodbreak=μbold1goodbreak+boldXbgoodbreak+Zaboldagoodbreak+Zmboldmgoodbreak+Zpboldpgoodbreak+bolde,where y is the vector of phenotypic measurements for the five aforementioned traits, μ is the population mean, b is the vector of fixed effects (herd‐year‐season and cage), a is the vector of direct additive genetic effects, m is the vector of maternal additive genetic effects, p is the vector of permanent environmental effects for BW, e is the vector of residuals, and X , Za, Zm and Zp are the corresponding incidence matrices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations