2006
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic overlap between P300, P50, and duration mismatch negativity

Abstract: Mismatch Negativity (MMN), P300, and P50 suppression event-related potential (ERP) components measure intermediate stages of information processing but little is known of how they relate to each other genetically. The present study used multivariate genetic model fitting analytic techniques in 46 monozygotic and 32 dizygotic twin pairs. P300, P50 suppression, and MMN were recorded using a 19-channel electroencephalograph (EEG). Zygosity was determined using DNA genotyping. Little evidence for either genetic or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high similarity of maximum MMN amplitude in MZ twins is consistent with previous ERP studies [8,36]. These results suggest genetic contributions to the MMNm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The high similarity of maximum MMN amplitude in MZ twins is consistent with previous ERP studies [8,36]. These results suggest genetic contributions to the MMNm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Impaired P50 sensory-gating responses, reduced amplitude in auditory N100, P200, and P300 ERP, and delayed latency in P300 ERP are robust findings in patients with SCZ and BPD and in their unaffected biological relatives [Bramon et al, 2004; Hall et al, 2006b, 2009; Turetsky et al, 2007; Salisbury et al, 2010] and have been suggested as likely endophenotypes [Braff et al, 2007a]. These ERPs components appear to be uncorrelated with one another, suggesting each may be mediated by distinct mechanisms [Hall et al, 2006a]. The underlying mechanisms and brain circuits subserving each ERP activity have been extensively studied using drug challenge investigations and animal models [Turetsky et al, 2007; Braff et al, 2007a; Javitt et al, 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these findings are often contradictory in terms of the co-occurrence of auditory ERP abnormalities in the same patient population, discrepancies might be attributed to the fact that the above-described ERPs are influenced by different factors such as stimulus parameters, attention, arousal, smoking status, or psychotropic medication [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%